Multipole expansion - small problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from Jackson regarding the multipole expansion of a potential due to a given localized charge distribution. The charge density is defined in terms of spherical coordinates, and the task involves determining the non-vanishing moments and expressing the potential at large distances using Legendre polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the term \(\frac{r^{l}_{<}}{r^{l+1}_{>}}\) and considers setting \(r<\) to a constant. There is a clarification provided regarding the definitions of \(r_<\) and \(r_>\). Another participant raises a concern about integrating the multipole expansion and expresses confusion regarding the treatment of the \(\sin\theta\) term in the integral.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, seeking clarification on specific terms and their implications in the context of the multipole expansion. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definitions of \(r_<\) and \(r_>\), but there remains uncertainty about the integration process and the role of certain terms.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of potential confusion regarding the integration limits and the treatment of spherical harmonics in relation to the charge distribution. The original poster's approach may be constrained by the specific requirements of the homework assignment.

Eats Dirt
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Jackson 4.7

Given a localized charge distribution:

<br /> \rho(r)=\frac{1}{64\pi}r^{2} e^{-r} sin^{2}\theta<br />

make the multipole expansion of the potential due to this charge distribution and determine all nonvanishing moments. Write down the potential at large distances as a finite expansion in Legendre polynomials.

Homework Equations


<br /> \frac{1}{x-x&#039;}=4\pi\sum^{\inf}_{l=0}\sum^{l}_{m=-l}\frac{1}{2l+1}\frac{r^{l}_{&lt;}}{r^{l+1}_{&gt;}}Y^{*}_{l,m}(\theta&#039;,\phi&#039;)Y_{l,m}(\theta,\phi)<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


My main problem is with the \frac{r^{l}_{&lt;}}{r^{l+1}_{&gt;}} Term as I don't know what I should set the r values to in this case, my original idea was to use the r< term as some constant say R then proceed with the multipole expansion but I think the solution does not have this term in it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##r_< = \min\{r,r'\}## and ##r_> = \max\{r,r'\}##
 
Hey, I had another problem I input the multipole expansion into the integral

<br /> \frac{1}{\epsilon_o}\int^{r}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{\pi}_{0}\frac{r&#039;^2 e^{-r&#039;}}{64\pi}4\pi\sin^2{\theta&#039;}\sum^{\inf}_{l=0}\sum^{l}_{m=-l}\frac{1}{2l+1}\frac{r&#039;^{l}}{r^{l+1}}Y^{*}_{l,m}(\theta&#039;,\phi&#039;)Y_{l,m}(\theta,\phi)r&#039;^2\sin\theta&#039;d\theta&#039;d\phi&#039;dr&#039;<br />

Now I have to integrate but have a problem on the sin\theta&#039; term, I know I can express the \sin^2\theta&#039;=1-\cos^2\theta&#039; which can then be used as a spherical harmonic but I do not know what to do with the sin(theta) term
 
What ##\sin\theta## term?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
965
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K