Multivariable Calculus - a question of limits

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a limit in the context of multivariable calculus, specifically using the formal definition of a limit involving epsilon and delta. The original poster expresses difficulty in simplifying the inequality related to the limit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the inequality but finds it complex and is unsure about simplifications. Some participants suggest using polar coordinates to simplify the limit expression, while others emphasize the necessity of adhering to the limit definition.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to the problem, with hints provided regarding the relationship between the variables involved. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the requirements and simplify the problem without reaching a consensus on a specific method.

Contextual Notes

There is a requirement to use the limit definition explicitly, which influences the approaches being considered. The original poster seeks clarification and hints to aid in their understanding of the problem.

PhysicalProof
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove the following, using the meaning of a limit:
2nsxd29.png


Homework Equations


epsilon > 0, delta > 0

0 < sqrt(x^2 + y^2) < delta
| f(x) - 0 | < epsilon (1)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know that I have to elaborate on the inequality in (1), further. However, I'm not sure of how to go about this. If I start transposing it seems to get much too messy and I end up with a proposed delta which seems far too complex. Is there some simplification that I'm overlooking here?

Any help is really appreciated, ta.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you not use polar coordinates instead?
Then the equation would be much simpler and the limit is just as r goes to 0
 
I did consider that but I'm pretty sure the limit definition must be used here (as a requirement).

Does anyone have any ideas of how to simplify this beast?

EDIT: Really need this one clarified guys. Does anyone have any hints at all? Even a vague idea.
 
Hint: use the fact that |x|<r and |y|<r, where r=sqrt(x^2+y^2).
 
vela said:
Hint: use the fact that |x|<r and |y|<r, where r=sqrt(x^2+y^2).

Bingo, great hint, thank you! Subtle yet it serves me well :D♦
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K