Muon g-2 and Muonic hydrogen anomalies

  • Thread starter Thread starter petergreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Muon
petergreat
Messages
266
Reaction score
4
What's the dominating opinion about the issue that muon g-2 deviates from the standard model? Is this generally considered as experimental inaccuracy, incompetent theoretical calculation, or genuinely beyond the standard model?

On a related front, I'd like to ask about the experimental aspects of the notorious "proton charge radius" anomaly from muonic hydrogen spectroscopy. Is any other group trying to reproduce the measurement? When can we expect any further experimental results of this sort, e.g. from muonic helium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re muon g-2: The calculation of this parameter is extremely difficult. After the experiments indicated an anomaly, further refinements in the calculation seem to have closed the gap. You can get a better picture of the current status from Google "muon g-2".
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top