Must the 1st derivative of phi be undetermined at V=infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Happiness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Phi
Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
Screen Shot 2015-12-07 at 10.26.48 pm.png


I think it is not true that a discontinuous ##\nabla^2\psi## implies a discontinuous ##\nabla\psi##, because a continuous function can have a discontinuous derivative, eg. ##y=|x|##.

Is it true that ##\nabla\psi## must always be undetermined at the boundary where ##V=\infty##?

Attached below is the whole paragraph that the sentence appears in:
Screen Shot 2015-12-07 at 10.27.02 pm.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Happiness said:
I think it is not true that a discontinuous ##\nabla^2\phi## implies a discontinuous ##\nabla\phi##, because a continuous function can have a discontinuous derivative, eg. ##y=|x|##.
That's not what it says. It says that the discontinuity of ##\nabla^2\psi## is the same as that of the potential, hence is a discontinuity of the second kind (infinite jump). Therefore the first derivative will be discontinuous.
 
  • Like
Likes Happiness
While it is true that a discontinuous second derivative does not imply a discontinuous first derivative, it is true that a continuous function can not have an infinite derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes Happiness
RUber said:
While it is true that a discontinuous second derivative does not imply a discontinuous first derivative, it is true that a continuous function can not have an infinite derivative.
Is there an implicit condition for this to be true?
Take ##f(x)=x^{1/3}##. This function is continuous, but the first derivative in x=0 is infinite.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Happiness
Thanks, Samy...I spoke too soon.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top