MWI -- Infinite number of worlds?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the implications of continuous probability spectra and the existence of an infinite number of universes. Participants argue that while MWI suggests an infinite number of worlds, it ultimately presents a singular quantum universe where worlds emerge post-decoherence. The conversation highlights the challenges in reconciling MWI with experimental outcomes and the necessity of additional assumptions for its validity, particularly regarding the nature of wavefunctions and the role of measurements in creating worlds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum decoherence and its implications
  • Knowledge of wavefunction ontology and measurement theory
  • Concepts of linear and nonlinear dynamics in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of quantum decoherence on MWI and measurement outcomes
  • Investigate the role of nonlinear electron-electron interactions in quantum mechanics
  • Study the derivation of the Born Rule in the context of MWI
  • Examine the Hartree-Fock Method and Gross-Pitaevskii approximation for many-body quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum foundations, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics and the Many-Worlds Interpretation.

  • #31
Cten said:
One conceptual/aesthetic/realism issue with MWI that arises for most of us relative laypeople is the notional continuous creation (to borrow an older term) of virtually infinite mass, energy and information at every decision point.

MWI does not say this happens. In MWI, the wave function is the reality, and there is only one wave function. It doesn't split. The appearance of multiple "worlds" comes from picking out particular terms in the wave function in some chosen basis and calling them "worlds". But there is only one wave function, and it always evolves unitarily in time, and unitary evolution can't create or destroy anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
entropy1 said:
Then it seems to me that MWI is really telling us that we can't say anything about the ontology of reality, right?

Yes! There is no single reality, which is essentially equivalent to no reality.
 
  • #33
PeterDonis said:
MWI does not say this happens. In MWI, the wave function is the reality, and there is only one wave function. It doesn't split. The appearance of multiple "worlds" comes from picking out particular terms in the wave function in some chosen basis and calling them "worlds". But there is only one wave function, and it always evolves unitarily in time, and unitary evolution can't create or destroy anything.

Helpful - thanks! First learned (a very little) about Everett and his work in the 1960s, and apparently been carrying around a distorted mental picture ever since.
 
  • #34
Lord Jestocost said:
There is no single reality

This is not what MWI says. MWI says there is a single reality, and it is the wave function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
866
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
12K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 183 ·
7
Replies
183
Views
19K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K