My 3rd question - About Stellar Spectrum

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasJoe40
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectrum Stellar
AI Thread Summary
Higher temperatures and pressures in stars lead to broadened absorption lines due to increased atomic collisions, which affect the energy levels of elements like hydrogen. The discussion distinguishes between Doppler broadening, caused by the random motion of atoms, and collisional broadening, which is influenced by gas density and collision frequency. Doppler broadening results in wider lines as temperature rises, while collisional broadening correlates with gas density, explaining why main-sequence stars have broader lines than more luminous giants. The area of the absorption line remains constant because it reflects the same energy produced, regardless of the line's width. This relationship between temperature, pressure, and spectral line characteristics is crucial for understanding stellar atmospheres.
ThomasJoe40
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hello, all

I have just read some foundamental concepts about EM spectrum in astronomy. One thing I don't quite understand is that "Stars with higher temperature or higher pressure shows a broadened line on its absorption spectrum". A brief explanation states that a higher temperature or pressure leads to a greater number of atomic collisions each time.

I am not absolutely convinced with the relation between atomic collision and broadening absorption line. An assuption I made is that the KE produced by collisions between atoms or ions does not absolutely fit the certain energy levels of an element (Hydrogen?). So, the broad of an absorption line is due to these random collisions. With higher the temperature or pressure, there should be a greater probabilities of collisions in each instance, which should leads to a broader line.

One last thing I can't figure out with is that the area of the absorption line (width times intensity) is always the same (same energy produced) Why? :confused:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There are three main mechanisms causing the broadening of spectral lines:
  1. Natural Broadening (due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle)
  2. Doppler (thermal) Broadening
  3. Pressure (collisional) Broadening
It seems that OP is mixing together mechanisms 2. and 3. in his post.

The source of Doppler Broadening is the fact that in thermal equilibrium the atoms in the stellar atmosphere are moving randomly with velocities described by Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. The light emitted or absorbed by the atoms is affected by Doppler effect: blue-shifted or red-shifted depending on the atom's velocity relative to the observer. The higher is the temperature, the wider is the distribution of velocities of the atoms and thus the broader line observed.

On the other hand, in case of the Collisional Broadening, the width of the spectral line is proportional to the density of the gas. The denser is the stellar atmosphere, the more frequent are the collisions and the broader is the line. This mechanism also explains the MK luminosity classes: The more luminous giant stars have lower densities in their upper atmospheres and thus their spectral lines are narrower. On the other hand, main-sequence stars have denser atmospheres where collisions are more frequent and thus the spectral lines are broader.
 
ThomasJoe40 said:
One last thing I can't figure out with is that the area of the absorption line (width times intensity) is always the same (same energy produced) Why?
This doesn't make sense to me. I don't think it is truth.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top