My Physics Teacher Must Really Hate Pianos

AI Thread Summary
A 350 kg piano dropped from a helicopter experiences less than 9.8 m/s² acceleration due to increasing air resistance. The upward force of air resistance is given as 1400 N, leading to a calculated acceleration of 5.8 m/s². The discussion emphasizes the importance of setting up equations correctly before substituting numbers to avoid confusion. Participants suggest using free body diagrams and algebraic manipulation to clarify the problem-solving process. Overall, the conversation highlights the value of mastering algebraic techniques in physics to enhance understanding and accuracy.
Medgirl314
Messages
568
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A 350 kg piano is dropped from a stationary helicopter. As it falls, it picks up speed and the air resistance increases, causing its acceleration to be less than 9.8 m/s2 What is the piano's acceleration at the moment that the air resistance is exerting an upward force of 1400 N?



Homework Equations


w=mg


The Attempt at a Solution



a=w-fair /m

w=mg
w= 350 kg*9.8 m/s2
w=3430 N
a=3400-1400 N / 350 kg
a=2030/350 kg =5.8 m/s2

This is less than the force of gravity, ans seems reasonable. Could someone confirm?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a=3400-1400 N / 350 kg
... so like the other one, you should do the algebra before you start using numbers then it is easier to see what is going on.

F = air resistance, mg = weight, and a is the acceleration ... then,
draw a free body diagram and picking down as positive:

mg-F=ma means that a=(mg-F)/m ...

... putting the numbers in now gets you the same thing ... but now you can tell if it is right or not because the setup and the algebra are all there without the numbers to hide things.
 
Thanks! I didn't have to mess with the equation too much, because my teacher had a similar one in an example. I usually find it harder to do the algebra first, but I can try it and see if it's easier in the end. Thank you!
 
Yah - if you just copy the examples, it'll bite you in the long run.
It takes a bit to get used to moving the variables around, but it pays off.
 
Thanks for the help! :smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top