My take on the anthropic principle.

  • Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date
  • #1
231
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

We all know the general definition of the anthropic principle, but here's my "take" on it, if you will.

Assume that life is super rare. Let's say that life is a near impossibility, but is still not ultimately precluded from occurring.

Despite this, it seems to me, that any intelligent life that does manage to arise under these conditions, will TAKE FOR GRANTED its existence.

Why? Well, being alive and having conscious thought is, in my opinion, all you CAN be aware of. Therefore, that very ability will be taken for granted, because nothing else could ever be known in the first place!

Sorry for this. I just have some random crap going through my head right now.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
275
2
I don't think that (sentient) life would tend to take itself for granted, and i don't think humanity does (the majority at least).
According to the cogito, you're aright about the awareness, i agree - but how does that lead to "that very ability being taken for granted"?
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,794
925
More precisely what do you mean by "taken for granted"?
 
  • #4
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,107
72
This isn't any "take" on the anthropic principle.
 

Related Threads for: My take on the anthropic principle.

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
793
Replies
7
Views
734
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
Top