My teacher asked Explain why it is necessary to standardize your

Thread starter Miike012
Start date Jul 13, 2011
Tags

Explain Teacher

AI Thread Summary

Standardizing an EDTA solution is crucial for ensuring accurate and reliable results in titrations and other analytical procedures. It involves determining the exact concentration of the EDTA solution, which is essential for precise measurements in complexometric titrations. Factors such as concentration and pH can significantly affect the performance of EDTA in binding metal ions. Understanding the purpose of the EDTA solution, such as its application in chelation or metal ion analysis, further emphasizes the need for standardization. Accurate standardization enhances the validity of experimental outcomes and supports consistent results across different experiments.

Jul 13, 2011

Miike012

my teacher asked
Explain why it is necessary to standardize your EDTA solution.

I am not totally sure why it is important.. can some one explain?

Physics news on Phys.org

Jul 14, 2011

pmsrw3

I'm not sure I even know what "standardize your EDTA solution" means. Does he/she mean concentration and pH? What are you going to use the EDTA solution for?

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »