My Terminal Velocity is Zero? (DE Question)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation problem related to terminal velocity in a physics context. The original poster is analyzing the behavior of velocity as time approaches infinity and is questioning the validity of their result, which suggests a terminal velocity of zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the limit of their velocity equation as time approaches infinity, expressing confusion over obtaining a terminal velocity of zero. Other participants provide alternative interpretations of the limit and engage in clarifying the mathematical reasoning behind the exponential term.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the implications of the mathematical expressions involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of limits and the need for integration when dealing with non-constant velocity, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made in the problem setup, particularly regarding the behavior of the velocity function over time and the conditions under which the terminal velocity is defined.

Bazzinga
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/11/60272414.png

Hey guys, I'm stuck on this question, part b)

I figured out a) and v(t) for V(0) = 0 ends up being

mg - mge-kt/m
k

(Sorry, latex was being difficult)

But then when I try to figure out the limit as t->infinity i get 0. I'm pretty sure the terminal velocity of jumping out of an airplane wouldn't be 0 :confused:

I'm hoping I just made a stupid mistake somewhere!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you're getting, I assume, is...

[tex]\frac{mg\left(1-e^{-\frac{kt}{m}}\right)}{k}[/tex]

I must say that as [itex]t\rightarrow\infty[/tex], that doesn't approach zero.[/itex]
 
Ha, see? stupid mistake :P
 
Hold up, you still get 0... e^0 = 1, 1 - 1 = 0, mg0 = 0, 0/k = 0
 
But as t approaches infinity, you don't get e^0. You get e^(-infinity), which is 0.
 
Ohhh! I get it, thanks! About part c)... distance = velocity x time, so would I just multiply my equation by t? I can't seem to wrap my head around this stuff
 
No, x=vt only for constant v. If the v is not constant (as this v isn't), you have to integrate v with respect to t to get the distance.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K