Mythbusters: Blow your own sail review

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JDługosz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Review
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a boat with a fan and a sail, as demonstrated in a Mythbusters episode. Participants explore the physics behind the boat's movement, the role of momentum, and the implications of pressure differences in the context of propulsion systems. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, practical implications, and hypothetical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over the mechanics of the boat's movement, questioning the validity of the explanation provided in the episode.
  • Others propose that the momentum of the moving air is equal and opposite to that of the boat, suggesting that a larger sail reverses most of the airflow.
  • A participant notes that the fan generates airflow that accelerates the boat backwards, while the sail captures the momentum of the air, leading to a force that opposes the fan's force.
  • There is a discussion about the elastic nature of the collision with the sail and the importance of the sail's size in preventing interference with the fan's airflow.
  • Some participants argue that the explanation should focus on the direction of airflow after interaction with the fan and sail, invoking Newton's third law.
  • Concerns are raised about the terminology used, particularly the word "suck," with some arguing that it can be misleading in describing forces and pressure differences.
  • A hypothetical scenario is proposed regarding the behavior of the fan and sail system in a zero-gravity environment, questioning whether the boat would still move in a closed system.
  • Participants debate whether the fan creates a pressure difference or simply accelerates air, with some suggesting both mechanisms are at play.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of thrust reversers on jet engines, drawing parallels to the fan and sail system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanics of the system, with multiple competing views and ongoing debate about the role of pressure, momentum, and terminology. Some participants agree on certain aspects, while others challenge those views, leading to unresolved questions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the ambiguity in the definitions of forces involved, the assumptions about airflow interactions, and the implications of the system being open versus closed. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and uncertainties regarding the physics at play.

  • #31
I used the term "suction force" as I did not know better. My faulted presumption was that we could define 1 bar to be 0-pressure, and that applying work to reduce this pressure would then give an average, directed negative (pulling) force on the boat, from the accelerating air's increasing momentum. Under a system-pressure of 1bar, air bodys wants to stay in a certain temperature-dependent average vicinity of each other, allthough they are not adhesive or cohesive.

I recognize this perception was wrong.

Your recognition of the (previously wrongly named) force vector sum's existence is appreciated.

What fired me up was that nobody seemed to care if this force was joined with thrust-force, even though they have different directions finally.

I'll tread carefully:smile:.

People rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
:smile:
 
  • #33
sophiecentaur said:
On any case, I have no objection to speaking in terms of pressure difference. It explains all of this very well on a macroscopic level. My problem is with the actual word Suck, which implies a pulling force (adhesion / cohesion) - which you don't get with gases. . So why use it?

Well, we have continuity in fluid mechanics, so the various points of a flow are connected -- we imagine streamlines even though we don't actually believe there are little strings pulling on the bits of fluid.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
olivermsun said:
Well, we have continuity in fluid mechanics, so the various points of a flow are connected --

Yes, because there is positive pressure keeping things together in a gas - which is what we're discussing. But I don't recall any mention of 'suck' in the fluid mechanics I have read about.

Look, I have no problem with sloppy speak between the cognoscenti but people on this forum very often need help with understanding and with resolving misconceptions. This is not helped by using terms which are blatantly not valid and which can be avoided with just a little care.
 
  • #35
Does the shape of the sail matter? e.g. If the sail was flat and rigid would the result change?
 
  • #36
Oh yes, definitely. The main effect would, I'm sure, be the direction in which the air spills off the edge of the sail. For a flat, rigid sail (a board?) the faster moving air would mainly emerge at right angles to the line of the craft, with equal forces in each lateral direction - no resultant force forward or backward.

But you can't afford to be too 'intuitive' when it comes to aerodynamics.
 
  • #37
I cringed when I heard them say that Newton's laws predict that the boat would not move. I wish they had asked a physicist! It's obvious that if the air recoils, the boat will move. And then they concluded something to the effect that Newton's laws had been proven wrong or something to that effect. :eek:
 
  • #38
At first, I had no explanation...the fan should be pushing backward with an equal force to the one that air is hitting the sail, but then I thought about Bernoulli. Isn't that the answer here? Put the fan back far enough from the sail and there will be more air particles hitting the sail than were originally moved by the fan. Bernoulli's principle FTW??
 
  • #39
boing! said:
At first, I had no explanation...the fan should be pushing backward with an equal force to the one that air is hitting the sail, but then I thought about Bernoulli. Isn't that the answer here? Put the fan back far enough from the sail and there will be more air particles hitting the sail than were originally moved by the fan. Bernoulli's principle FTW??

Welcome to Physics Forums, boing!

This scenario also came up in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=510723". I offered an answer in terms of conservation of momentum in post #20.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
boing! said:
At first, I had no explanation...the fan should be pushing backward with an equal force to the one that air is hitting the sail, but then I thought about Bernoulli. Isn't that the answer here? Put the fan back far enough from the sail and there will be more air particles hitting the sail than were originally moved by the fan. Bernoulli's principle FTW??

If you "close the system" you will find that your scenerio does not work.
If you "open the system" the environmental air simply will not do as you suggest.
 
  • #41
I too was baffled by this, but I think I have an explanation not covered anywhere in this thread yet... I can also explain why they didn't get a result until they cranked the propeller to 11 and a had massive sail!

First, all of Newtons laws are in effect. Technically the force by the boat would be canceled if all energy is caught by there sail. Simple as that, there should be 0 net force on the system! But...

I think this is explained by the shape of their Sail. Air currents hitting the center of the sail have four escape routes: left/right, or up/down. Here's the thing, the sail is _not_ flat, it's parabolic!

The left/right escape routes are on the same plane (depth) as the entry point (the center of the sail). In other terms, the left/right escape routes are at the apex of of the parabola. Any air exiting left/right does so perpendicular to entrance of the air current, leaving 0 net force on the boat.

However, the top/bottom escape routes are _rearward_ of the apex. This means any air currents escaping top/bottom would _not_ be escaping exactly perpendicular! They would be angled slightly aft (backwards probably 15degrees), giving a net force forward!

The vertically oriented air currents are likely to be very minor, as the left/right escape routes offer much less resistance. So cranking the fan to 11 finally produces enough force to get the affect.

The oversized sail (Much LARGER than the incoming stream) allows the the vertical oriented air currents to escape around the incoming stream. A small sail would simply not allow the currents to escape around the incoming airstream, cancelling those vectors.

Two experiments would confirm this...

First, create a perfectly flat sail. Air must be able to escape equally in all directions with no pressure differences in any vector.

Second, create a massive "Angel Food Cake Pan" shaped sail and a very very VERY narrow central airstream. The shape of the "Angel Food Cake Pan" would reverse the incoming vector backwards moving the boat forward.

This was really bothering me, but finally I think I have a reasonable explanation!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
15K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
20K