A N=2 Super Yang-Mills: Auxiliary Fields Question

StuartY
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was wondering since the Vector supermultiplet in N=2 SUSY can be built from a Chiral and a Vector supermultiplet from N=1, in order to make up the off-shell degrees of freedom, would you include the two auxiliary fields from the N=1 theory (traditionally F from the Chiral and D from the vector multiplets), or would you make them up using a single auxiliary field? I'm sorry if this was a terrible question or has been poorly worded.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with N=2 SYM, but what does your off-shell counting suggest?
 
Sorry for the late reply. So off-shell for N=1 requires 2 bosonic d.o.f. for the chiral superultiplet, and 1 for the vector. For N=2 the vector supermultiplet requires 3 bosonic d.o.f.. I've been looking at this some more, and I think I'm getting even more confused because when I try and write out a Lagrangian for the N=2 vector supermultiplet I get the same Lagrangian as for the N=1 gauge theory.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Back
Top