N-dimensional RV vs DT Random process

AI Thread Summary
A discrete random process can be seen as a collection of random variables indexed by time, while an N-dimensional random variable consists of N random variables with a joint probability mass function (pmf). The key difference lies in their treatment; a discrete time random process may exhibit dependencies, such as in a Markov process, where each variable depends only on the previous one. Additionally, a sequence in a random process can have an unlimited number of terms, whereas an N-dimensional variable is typically analyzed as a single entity. Ultimately, the distinction is primarily contextual, focusing on interpretation rather than fundamental differences. Understanding these nuances is crucial for proper application in probability theory.
dionysian
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
If a discrete random process can be viewed as a collection of random variables indexed by a value n and a discrete N dimensional random variable can be viewed as N random variables with with a joint pmf. In these cases it seems like there is not much difference between a N dimensional random variable and a discrete time random process.

Know i am sure I am missing something very subtle but important here. I geuss me question is how is a discrete time random process diffrent than a n deminsional random varible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The difference is primary how they are handled. A sequence (for example) might be treated as a Markov process, where each variable is dependent on the value of the previous trial, but none before that. Also when dealing with a sequence, there is no limit on the number of terms, while treating it in n dimensions usually means the vector is studied as one entity.
 
Thanks for your reply mathman. So the two are very similar but they are just interpreted diffrently? Is there any diffrence other than that which someone might know about?
 
I can't fully understand your second question, but the point is there is nothing other than how I described it. Context is the main point.
 
Thanks mathman. I think I get it now.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top