I don't think it is useful to develop a Socratic dialogue to try make you answer what I was asking in #12.
You have or certainly will come across the -ous, -ic suffixes
As in Ferrous ion/oxide/chloride for Fe
2+, FeO, FeCl
2
Ferric ion/oxide/chloride for Fe
3+, Fe
2O
3, FeCl
3
Or Cuprous ion/oxide/chloride Cu
+, Cu
2O, CuCl
Cupric ion/oxide/chloride Cu
2+, CuO, CuCl
2
and then Stannous Sn
2+, SnO, SnCl
2, Stannic Sn
+4, SnO
2, SnCl
4
With Mercurous/ic those are the main ones for metals/cations you are likely to hear, but I have certainly heard of cobaltous/cobaltic, and even Titanous/Titanic! Then for nonmetallic anions there are sulphurous/ic, phosphorous/ic, bromous/ic etc.
So the rule as in these examples is that when an element has two common oxidation states other than 0, the substance with the lower number (positive or negative) is called -ous, and the higher one -ic. Above we had examples where the where the -ous had oxidation levels +1, +2, +3 and the -ic 1 or 2 above, +2, +3, +4.
This terminology begins to sound a little old-fashioned and I think it's become more common to indicate oxidation state by formula with number, eg Cu(1), Cu(2) even in speaking; Roman numerals I,II, III are also used. Or indicated another way, e.g. titanium dioxide, lead dioxide. I don't know if there have been any official rulings about all this, but you certainly will still encounter the -ous, -ic terminology – it suffices to look at the chemical catalogues.
https://www.sccollege.edu/Departments/STEM/Documents/Handouts/GenChem_Nomenclature_Updated.pdf
http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/ferric-chloride/ferric-chlorideh.htm