Naming systems physics vs biology

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the naming conventions in biology compared to those in physics. It highlights that while physics often features eponymous units and theories, such as Newton's laws and the Feynman integral, biology also has its share of eponymous names, particularly in disease naming after discoverers, like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. The conversation notes that biology tends to use more formal Latin-based terminology, contrasting with the playful and informal names found in physics and astronomy, such as "MACHOs" and "WIMPs." However, there are humorous names in biology, particularly among Drosophila genes, with examples like "tinman" for a gene affecting heart development and "Van Gogh" for a wing pattern mutation. Overall, the discussion acknowledges both the formal and informal aspects of naming in biology, emphasizing the presence of humor in certain contexts.
SUDOnym
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
(I think I could equally have posted this in the biology section!).

I know nothing about formal structure of biology..and hope that I will be enlightened.

My question is to do with naming systems in physics vs naming systems in biology..
In physics nearly all units that you care to mention are eponymouse eg. Newton, watt, joule, gauss,... etc..
Is there an equivelant in biology?
further, in physics (and maths and chemistry) pretty much all theories and inventions are eponymous, eg. feynman integral, einstein coefficients, Newton's laws, Greene's theorem... I could name a hundred million more!
again, Is there something similar to that in biology?

Finally, there is a kind of playfulness or lack of formality in some names thought up physicists and astronomers. an obvious example for playfulness is the acronyms MACHOs and WIMPS. Regarding lack of formality, look at the names of subatomic particle "strange" "charm" "up" "down" etc... In astronomy (as Neill De Grasse Tyson often points out), there is very strong tendency to name things very informally (ie. they are named after what they look like). eg. the "red spot" on jupiter. any nebula you can think of - "cat's eye" "dumbbell" etc...

Does this lack of formallity and sometimes humerous naming exist in biology? - as an outsider (and again this is pointed out by Tyson) much of biology naming systems seem to have very technical latin roots and so on...

All comments appreciated!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Well, diseases are often named after the discoverer. A very curious tradition in my opinion, it doesn't really give a family name a positive vibe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genetic_disorders

There are certainly humorous names as well, the Drosophila genes would be the best example. I don't know the best website, but this a nice list to get you started: http://jpetrie.myweb.uga.edu/genes.html or http://sciencereview.berkeley.edu/articles/issue2/flyname.pdf

As an example, the gene that causes Drosophila embryos to lack a heart is called tinman. Flies with swirling wing-hair patterns carry a mutation in Van Gogh. Grim and reaper both play a role in cell death.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like Monique said, many diseases are named after their discoverers (you might be familiar with Alzheimers, Parkinsons, Hunnington's disease etc). Well you have chemicals like draculin and traumatic acid. Another one I like is Janus family of Protein Kinases (both because of the name followed now and the name that was originally given to it).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_kinase
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
I use ethanol for cleaning glassware and resin 3D prints. The glassware is sometimes used for food. If possible, I'd prefer to only keep one grade of ethanol on hand. I've made sugar mash, but that is hardly the least expensive feedstock for ethanol. I had given some thought to using wheat flour, and for this I would need a source for amylase enzyme (relevant data, but not the core question). I am now considering animal feed that I have access to for 20 cents per pound. This is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top