Schools Nanoscale Engineering at University of Maryland: Worth It?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the acceptance into a nanoscale engineering program and a comparison with the University of Maryland's materials engineering program, particularly regarding the reputation and academic standing of the nanoscale engineering faculty. The program's lack of ranking raises concerns about its recognition in the field, despite having excellent facilities and strong industry connections. The lower stipend offered by the nanoscale program compared to UMD prompts questions about the overall value of the program. The absence of replies to the inquiry suggests uncertainty about the program's reputation, leading to further contemplation on whether it holds significant merit in the academic community.
cjw21
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I got accepted to this program and to University of Maryland's materials engineering program (where I would also be studying nanoscale properties), and was curious how the nanoscale engineering program there is regarded, since it is never ranked (since it doesn't fit in any engineering categories). The facilities are great and they seem to have close ties with industry, but academically I'm curious whether their professors are viewed as heavyweights in the field. Additionally, they gave me a much lower stipend than UMD, so I'm curious whether it would be worth it, or if the two are comparable. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
...does no replies mean it doesn't have much of a reputation at all?! anyone?!
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top