Nanowatt Switch - Trigger Input & 0.4V to 2V Range

  • Thread starter Thread starter wondering12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Switch
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a low-power equivalent to relays or optocouplers that operates in the nanowatt range, specifically for voltages between 0.4V and 2V and low currents in milliamps. The limitations of MOSFETs are highlighted due to their inability to isolate gate switches and the inherent current drop during conduction. Relays are preferred for their lack of voltage drop when activated, but their trigger inputs consume significant power. Optoisolators are noted for their losses in both switching and triggering. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of managing thermal and shot noise, suggesting the use of parametric amplifiers and a restricted bandwidth for optimal performance.
wondering12
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
I am looking for equivalent of relay or optocoupler but in nanowatts range if there is any.
I looked into a MOSFET however gate switch cannot be isolated and there is Id drop when conducting. Relay is cool because there is no current drop or voltage drop when switch is on. Timing is in millisecond range.

----- ------- switch
---------

---=====----- trigger input

however trigger input has coil which has consumes lots of watts.
Optoisolator has losses in both ways (switch and trigger input).
Voltages are of 0.4V minimum to 2V maximum. Currents are in low mAmps.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
wondering12 said:
Greetings,
I am looking for equivalent of relay or optocoupler but in nanowatts range if there is any.
I looked into a MOSFET however gate switch cannot be isolated and there is Id drop when conducting. Relay is cool because there is no current drop or voltage drop when switch is on. Timing is in millisecond range.

----- ------- switch
---------

---=====----- trigger input

however trigger input has coil which has consumes lots of watts.
Optoisolator has losses in both ways (switch and trigger input).
Voltages are of 0.4V minimum to 2V maximum. Currents are in low mAmps.

You will have to take care about thermal noise V=4kTBR in every resistor and shot noise in every flowing charge.
Use a very restricted bandwidth B. A sharply tuned circuit (Care - it limits rapidity of response)
Use NO RESISTORS. Use parametric amplifiers (work by varying L or C)

Good luck - you deserve it for trying.


The human eye (one photon) and the human ear (120 db power range) are good inspirations!
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top