NASA Finds Evidence of "Soaking Wet" Mars with Rover

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phobos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Rover
AI Thread Summary
NASA's Mars rovers have discovered strong evidence that Mars was once covered in water, indicating it may have been "soaking wet." The findings include sulfates that could help confirm the planet's potential for past life in future missions. Speculation surrounds the fate of this water, with theories suggesting it could have formed underground lakes, been absorbed into rocks, or lost to space through evaporation. Discussions also touch on the possibility of catastrophic events altering Mars' environment, leading to the formation of iron oxide in the soil. These discoveries are likely to spur further robotic and crewed missions to Mars.
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,956
Reaction score
7
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It will be interesting to see speculation about what happened to the water. Underground lakes? Absorbed into rocks? Evaporated, hydrolyzed and lost to space?

Njorl
 
I watched the webcast, they said they've also found sulfates that could be examined by a later mission to finding fairly definite proof of past life.
 
Woohoo!
 
Originally posted by Njorl
It will be interesting to see speculation about what happened to the water. Underground lakes? Absorbed into rocks? Evaporated, hydrolyzed and lost to space?

Njorl

Perhaps the environment became unstable due to catastraphic activities, (E.G. volcanoes, asteriod bombardment, Texan-equivalant of Mars elected to presidential office, et cetera.) and the iron core melded with the water. Maybe Valles Marineris might have been a bridge between the core and the oceanic crust. A crust-core link would cool down the planet, leave carbon-based gas emissions, and cause iron oxide to form throughout the planet's soil.

I suppose this will encourage both robotic and crewed missions to our mysterious neighbour.
 
Originally posted by Njorl
It will be interesting to see speculation about what happened to the water. Underground lakes? Absorbed into rocks? Evaporated, hydrolyzed and lost to space?
The most likely is permafrost, which is at, or close to, the surface pole-ward of ~60o to ~80o, and is increasingly deep at lower latitudes. How deep is the permafrost? The top ~200m is dry ('ice free'), with permafront at ~450m at equatorial latitudes. How do we know this? Rampart craters - their distribution by depth and latitude [Hartmann*, p100].

A lot of water was lost to space, and some is certainly hydrolysed.


*William K. Hartmann "A Traveler's Guide to Mars"

[Edit: checked Hartmann re permafrost, edited appropriately]
 
Last edited:
Please update your estimates for Drake's variables.
 
Ward and Brownlee

Anyone read Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee's "Rare Earth"?

Very interesting, especially http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-53/iss-9/p62.html .

Oh, and it takes a somewhat different look at the Drake equation ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top