Natural frequency of a simple harmonic system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the natural frequency of a system consisting of two circular cylinders and a connecting link, focusing on small oscillations and energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the natural frequency using energy equations and the equation of motion for simple harmonic systems. Some participants question the frame of reference for the velocities involved, suggesting that the calculations may need to be consistent across the system.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, providing guidance on clarifying assumptions about reference frames. There is an acknowledgment of a potential miscalculation in the velocities, leading to further exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted discrepancy in the reference frames used for calculating the velocities of the components in the system, which may affect the derived expressions for energy and frequency.

TomW17
Messages
10
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Derive the natural frequency f_n of the system composed of two homogeneous circular cylinders, each of mass M, and the connecting link \text{AB} of mass m. Assume small oscillations.
SHM.jpg


Homework Equations


The sum of the kinetic + potential energies in an isolated system remains constant.

An undamped, simple harmonic system has an equation of motion of the form \ddot{\theta} + \omega^{2}_n \theta = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


The sum of the kinetic + potential energy when the system rotates by an angle \theta measured as in the diagram counterclockwise is \sum E = V + T = mg r_0 (1 - \cos \theta ) + \tfrac{1}{2} m v_{AB}^{2} + 2 \times \tfrac{1}{2} M v_{O}^2 + 2 \times \tfrac{1}{2} I_O \dot{\theta}^2 = \text{const.}

where v_O denotes the velocity of the centre of mass of the cylinders, \dot{\theta} denotes the angular velocity of the system (and by extension the angular velocity of the cylinders) and v_{AB} the velocity of the centre of mass of \text{AB}.

E = mgr_0 (1 - \cos \theta ) + \tfrac{1}{2} m (r_0 \dot{\theta})^2 + M (r \dot{\theta})^2 + \tfrac{1}{2} M r^2 \dot{\theta}^2 = \text{const.}
\implies \frac{\text{d}E}{\text{d}t} = mg r_0 \sin \theta \dot{\theta} + m r^{2}_0 \dot{\theta} \ddot{\theta} + 3 Mr^2 \dot{\theta} \ddot{\theta} = 0

using small angle approximation and rearranging...

\ddot{\theta} + \frac{mgr_0}{3Mr^2 + mr^{2}_0} \theta = 0 \implies \omega_n = \sqrt{\frac{mgr_0}{3Mr^2 + mr^{2}_0}} \implies f_n = \frac{1}{2\pi} \omega_n

The answer given in the book is f_n = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{mgr_0}{3Mr^2 + m(r-r_0)^{2}}}

Comparing the answers, my problem appears to be that I've calculated the kinetic energy of the link \text{AB} incorrectly but I can't figure out why. My logic was that the angle \theta is the angle between the vertical through the centre of the cylinder and the line connecting the centre of the cylinder and the end of the link \text{AB}, so the velocity of the end of \text{AB} would be equal to \dot{\theta} r_0 (angular velocity x arm) and as \text{AB} remains horizontal throughout, the velocity of the centre of mass of \text{AB} would be the same as the velocity of its end.

Help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could put in a few more steps to help a tired old duffer understand how you get each thing.

It looks like you have ##v_{AB}## as ##r_0 \dot{\theta}##, and ##V_O## as ##r \dot{\theta}##. But you need to be sure that these are both in the same frame of reference. Are these both with respect to the ground?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TomW17
DEvens said:
You could put in a few more steps to help a tired old duffer understand how you get each thing.

It looks like you have ##v_{AB}## as ##r_0 \dot{\theta}##, and ##V_O## as ##r \dot{\theta}##. But you need to be sure that these are both in the same frame of reference. Are these both with respect to the ground?
Ahaa, there's my problem. No, I've calculated v_{AB} to be wrt the centre of the cylinder but v_O is wrt the ground.
 
DEvens said:
You could put in a few more steps to help a tired old duffer understand how you get each thing.

It looks like you have ##v_{AB}## as ##r_0 \dot{\theta}##, and ##V_O## as ##r \dot{\theta}##. But you need to be sure that these are both in the same frame of reference. Are these both with respect to the ground?
Got the right answer when I take ##v_{AB}## wrt the ground. Thanks for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DEvens

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K