Understanding the Relationship Between Natural Logarithms and Their Reciprocals

  • Thread starter Thread starter alijan kk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm Natural
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the relationship 1/log_a(e) = log_e(a) and understanding why they are reciprocals. Participants emphasize the equivalence of logarithmic and exponential forms, illustrating that y = log_a(x) is equivalent to x = a^y. They note that this relationship holds for all positive real numbers a and the natural number e. Some contributors express difficulty in proving the identity, while others provide insights on using logarithmic conversions to demonstrate the proof. Overall, the conversation highlights the fundamental properties of logarithms and their reciprocal nature.
alijan kk
Messages
130
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


1/loga(e) = loge(a)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


how they are reciprocals of each other ? is their any longer but intuative way to show this result
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you mean:
\frac{1}{\log_a(e)} = \log_e(a)
 
  • Like
Likes alijan kk
phyzguy said:
I think you mean:
\frac{1}{\log_a(e)} = \log_e(a)
yes sir i mean that
 
alijan kk said:
how they are reciprocals of each other ? is their any longer but intuative way to show this result

##a^{\log_a(e)}=e##, right? Just take ##\log_e## of both sides.
 
There's an important part missing from your problem statement:
alijan kk said:

Homework Statement


Prove that[/B] 1/loga(e) = loge(a)
Along the lines of Dick's hint are these relationships:
##y = \log_a(x) \Leftrightarrow x = a^y##
I.e., the two equations are equivalent: any pair of values (x, y) that satisfies the first equation also satisfies the second equation, and vice versa.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and alijan kk
Mark44 said:
There's an important part missing from your problem statement:

Along the lines of Dick's hint are these relationships:
##y = \log_a(x) \Leftrightarrow x = a^y##
I.e., the two equations are equivalent: any pair of values (x, y) that satisfies the first equation also satisfies the second equation, and vice versa.
Here is a way that I like to remember it. When I see ##y = \log_a(x) ## and want to convert it to something like ##x = a^y,## I use this to help remember.

Think of log base 10. So we have ##y = \log_{10}(1000) ##. This is pretty easy, there are 3 zeros and the answer is y = 3. The log is equivalent to the exponent.
We have 103 = 1000.
 
scottdave said:
The log is equivalent to the exponent.
Not only that -- a logarithm is by definition an exponent. Specifically, ##\log_a(x)## represents the exponent on a that produces x.
Using your example, ##\log_{10}(1000) = 3## because ##10^3 = 1000##.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
I think the relation in the problem statement is true for all positive real a and e. I found this rather difficult to prove. I had to go to a spreadsheet and plug in some values to convince myself it was true. My proof starts with the statement "a=a." Then I substitute an exponential for a on the left hand side. I think I am not supposed to give the full solution here. Good luck! :)
 
Gene Naden said:
I think the relation in the problem statement is true for all positive real a and e.
It wasn't stated in the first post, but the equation is an identity. Yes, it is true for all a > 0, and e is "the natural number," approximately 2.718.

Gene Naden said:
I found this rather difficult to prove.
It's not difficult to prove. Let ##y = \log_a(e)##. This is equivalent to the equation ##e = a^y##. Substitute for e in the expression on the left side of the original equation, ##\frac 1 {log_a(e)}##, and within a couple of steps you end up with the expression on the right side.
 
  • Like
Likes alijan kk and scottdave
  • #10
You can convert a log of one base to another base. I'm on my phone so I'm not sure if I can do LateX correctly though. If you have log(x) in base b. You can calculate it by LN(x) / LN(b), where LN is the natural log (log base e)
 
  • Like
Likes alijan kk
  • #11
So using that, substitute LN(e) for 1.
 
  • #12
Oops, I meant loga(a) = 1
 
Back
Top