Natural Resources: Will They End?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonu_sais
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural Resources
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of natural resources and whether they will ever be completely exhausted on Earth. A clear definition of natural resources is debated, suggesting that anything existing in nature can be deemed useful. As long as physical substances remain on Earth, natural resources will exist. However, some specific resources may become depleted over time, leading to the need for substitutes. The potential advancement of technologies, such as nuclear fusion, could render certain resources like coal and petroleum obsolete due to higher costs, lower convenience, and increased pollution. In this context, resources may be considered "exhausted" not solely due to depletion but because they lose their practicality and desirability.
sonu_sais
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
will the natural resources ever end from Earth completely
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I suppose that a question like that forces us to examine some of our common assumptions. We all talk about "natural resources", but does nay of us have a clear and quantifiable deffinition of what constitutes a natural resource? Anything that exists in nature could be usefull to someone in some way. By this deffinition, so long as physicall substances exist on Earth, there will be natural resources. But once the planet ceases to exist, there will, of course, be no naturall resources on the planet.

I think that some resources will run out, but we will find a way to substitute these. So I don't think that we will ever run out of natural resources as a whole, but we may (in fact, I think we certainly shall) exhaust some individuall resources in the very distant future.

It should also be noted that if and when we refine nuclear fusion (for example) to the point where it is practical to use, coal and/or petrolium fuels may no longer be used because they are more expensive, less convenient, and a greater source of pollution. Once this happens it could be said that these things have been exhausted as resources, not because their supply ran out, but their usefullness. Once they are no longer considered usefull or disirable, they cease to be "resources".
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top