Nature of photons presented in high school text books

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the nature of photons and their representation in high school textbooks, particularly the misconception that photons are exclusively associated with visible light. Participants clarify that photons exist across the entire electromagnetic (EM) spectrum, including radio waves, X-rays, and gamma rays. The conversation also addresses the characteristics of light waves, distinguishing between classical transverse waves and the internal structure of photons. Ultimately, the consensus affirms the existence of photons and their role as carriers of electromagnetic radiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic spectrum terminology
  • Basic knowledge of wave mechanics, including transverse and longitudinal waves
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Concept of photon as an elementary particle in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the electromagnetic spectrum and its various components, including X-rays and gamma rays
  • Study the principles of wave mechanics, focusing on transverse and longitudinal waves
  • Explore quantum mechanics, particularly the role of photons in electromagnetic phenomena
  • Investigate the detection methods for photons and the implications of weak light sources on observation
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and physics enthusiasts seeking a deeper understanding of photons, their properties, and their representation in educational materials.

hl_world
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Why did textbooks (when I was in high school 5 1/2 years ago) always associate photons with the visible light part of the EM spectrum. Wouldn't the radio, x-ray, gamma, etc. areas of the spectrum exist as photons too?

What about the transverse waves; would it not form a helix shape instead of the classic wave pattern on a flat plane? The former seems more realistic to me.

Do photons REALLY exist? Think about it - a particle of which there would be a finite number of in the universe. A light source emits a certain number of photons per 3 dimensional degree. Eventually, wouldn't said photons diverge enough that would render the light source invisible to any telescope (because no photons are available to enter the lens). It makes me think that radiation energy exists as a longitudinal wave (like sound through matter medium) but with some other unseen, unfelt, unknown medium.

Your thoughts?
 
Science news on Phys.org
From what I recall, "light" has erroneously been equated to "visible light."

I believe that in the simplest environment, a local vacuum, light waves (free photons) are sinusoidal and unpolarized.

The photon model fits with the vast majority of experimental and theoretical physics, from quantum mechanics to general relativity, from electromagnetism to thermodynamics.
 
I always thought "light" meant visible light. Ie, X-rays aren't light, they are x-rays. But all are forms of em radiation.
 
"Light" is sometimes used for electromagnetic radiation just beyond visible light, i. e., "infrared light" or "ultraviolet light."
 
i see what you mean by the point of no photons available to enter the telescope and what happens is light is not emitted by the start at any specific direction but photons are emitted at random directions every second or fraction of a second, and during this the photons emitted by the light reaches every possible region in the universe and since the number photons emitted is very large it looks like the star is emitting the photons in all directions, that is why sometimes the telescopes point at the same astronomical objects for seconds,minutes and sometimes hours.
 
Last edited:
hl_world said:
Why did textbooks (when I was in high school 5 1/2 years ago) always associate photons with the visible light part of the EM spectrum. Wouldn't the radio, x-ray, gamma, etc. areas of the spectrum exist as photons too?
Yes.
hl_world said:
What about the transverse waves; would it not form a helix shape instead of the classic wave pattern on a flat plane? The former seems more realistic to me.
You need to make a distinction between a classical wave (or the wavefunction of a photon if you like) and the internal field of the photon itself. You can get classical transverse waves and you can get classical helical waves (one just has a linear polarisation, while the other has a circular polarisation). Asking what the internal field of a photon however is like asking what the internal mass/charge distribution of an electron is - a question that, to me, doesn't make a great deal of sense.

hl_world said:
Do photons REALLY exist?
Yes.
hl_world said:
Think about it - a particle of which there would be a finite number of in the universe. A light source emits a certain number of photons per 3 dimensional degree. Eventually, wouldn't said photons diverge enough that would render the light source invisible to any telescope (because no photons are available to enter the lens). It makes me think that radiation energy exists as a longitudinal wave (like sound through matter medium) but with some other unseen, unfelt, unknown medium.

Your thoughts?
Probabilistically, the weaker a source the less photons per unit time will strike the detector. Thus the weaker a source, the longer we need to look to see a photon, which is a fairly well understood imaging principle. In practice our ability to detect a source is limited by the number of false positives (or dark counts) a photon counter tends to generate.

Claude.
 
In physics, the photon is the elementary particle responsible for electromagnetic phenomena.It is the carrier of electromagnetic radiation .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K