A Nature of radiation emanating from a body v/s frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences in radiation emitted by dense bodies like black holes compared to regular stars such as the Sun. It is suggested that black holes emit higher frequency radiation, particularly X-rays, while stars primarily emit UV, visible, and infrared radiation. However, it is clarified that black holes themselves do not radiate in the conventional sense; instead, the X-rays observed are often from material falling into them before crossing the event horizon. The complexity of Hawking Radiation is also noted, indicating that understanding black hole radiation involves intricate physics. Overall, the nature of radiation from black holes differs significantly from that of regular stars.
petrushkagoogol
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
Does the nature of radiation emitted by dense bodies like black holes differ in frequency from radiation emitted by regular stars like our Sun ? I believe that the former radiates more x-rays and high frequencies rather than the latter which radiates mainly uv, visible and infrared ranges. Is this so ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
petrushkagoogol said:
Does the nature of radiation emitted by dense bodies like black holes differ in frequency from radiation emitted by regular stars like our Sun ? I believe that the former radiates more x-rays and high frequencies rather than the latter which radiates mainly uv, visible and infrared ranges. Is this so ?
Black holes do not radiate in the way you seem to think. Deducing the frequency of Hawking Radiation apparently is quite complex.
 
petrushkagoogol said:
Does the nature of radiation emitted by dense bodies like black holes differ in frequency from radiation emitted by regular stars like our Sun ? I believe that the former radiates more x-rays and high frequencies rather than the latter which radiates mainly uv, visible and infrared ranges. Is this so ?

phinds said:
Black holes do not radiate in the way you seem to think.

Phinds is correct
... maybe you were thinking of the X-rays that are radiated by the material falling towards the black hole, prior to it crossing the event horizon
do some googling on Cygnus X-1 for one of the earlier black hole X-ray sources identifiedDave
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top