Navier stokes equeations, shear term

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
navalstudent
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey!, I was repeating for myself a course I had from a earlier year, fluid mechanics. I looked at the derivation of the navier stokes equations, and there is one term that does not give meaning to me.


Take a look at the x-momentum equation here:
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/nseqs.html

The term I don't get is the d/dx(tau_xx). I mean what does this term mean physically? It is a shear stress in the x-direction that is acting on the the surface wit an x-normal? Tau_xy and tau_xz is easy to understand from ordinary mechanics, but not tau_xx. I tought only the term -d/dx(P) would give a normal stress in the x-direction.

So can someone please explain to me how we can have a shear stress in the x-direction acting on the x surface(y-z-plane).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andy Resnick said:
That is an odd way to write the equations; I thought the diagonal components of the stress tensor (tau_xx, tau_yy, tau_zz) end up in the pressure term.

Hello Andy Resnick.

That is what I also tought at first, but the fact is that these terms are not the classical preassure terms. And I still have not been able to find a physical explanation for them.

Could one say that since the fluid has viscosity, we will have a "glue-effect", so that the normal strains contains preassure terms, and since the fluid is sticky, the viscosity will "drag" the fluid forward?(if we have a velocity gradient in the normal-direction). Note: I have not talked about shear-stresses here.
 
here's what I dug up:

keywords: Turbulence modeling, dynamic viscocity (aka absolute viscocity), reynold's stress

wiki said:
It should also be noted that the theory of the Reynolds stress is quite analogous to the kinetic theory of gases, and indeed the stress tensor in a fluid at a point may be seen to be the ensemble average of the stress due to the thermal velocities of molecules at a given point in a fluid. Thus, by analogy, the Reynolds stress is sometimes thought of as consisting of an isotropic pressure part, termed the turbulent pressure, and an off-diagonal part which may be thought of as an effective turbulent viscosity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_stress

Dynamic Viscocity:
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/dynamic-absolute-kinematic-viscosity-d_412.html
 
I tried parsing my go-to reference for this stuff (Non-Linear field theories of Mechanics, Handbuch der Physics vol III/3) and was promptly confused.

They do write down a general constitutive relation for fluids T + p1, and there is no restriction on the Cauchy stress tensor, but by the time they get to Korteweg's theory, I got lost in a maze of tensor representation theorems.

I wish the GRC site gave a little more information, instead of just tossing out a formula.