Need Answers for Grade 12 Equilibrium Review?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a request for answers to multiple-choice questions from a Grade 12 equilibrium review textbook. The user has listed their answers for questions 1 to 11 but is seeking confirmation on their correctness. Forum members clarify that the platform is not designed for checking homework answers and encourage the user to ask specific questions or concepts instead. They also remind the user to adhere to the forum rules regarding homework help. Engaging with the community for concept clarification is recommended for better understanding.
winterwonderl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm doing the review in my textbook and there are no answers for the multiple choice. http://scc.scdsb.edu.on.ca/Students/onlinecourses/Sikora/sch4u/v12/95.pdf I'm doing questions 1 to 11 and I was hoping I could get some answers to see if mine are right? THANK YOU!

1)d
2)c
3)b
4)d
5)a
6)b
7)d
8)c
9)c
10)b
11)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to physicsforums @winterwonderl.
This is not how the forums work. We are happy to help you with concepts / questions, homework or otherwise, but people won't check all of your homework answers for you.

If you are particularly unsure about any question or concept, please post to the appropriate homework question / coursework subforum.
 
In other words: please read forum rules.
 
I wasn't aware of that.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top