Need Articles relating to research in the health sciences.

AI Thread Summary
To find articles on surgery, diabetes, and cancer, PubMed is recommended as a primary resource for biomedical research. Users can access abstracts to determine relevance before seeking full articles. It's advised to check with school libraries for access to full texts, as many may be available electronically through institutional subscriptions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of utilizing reliable academic sources for health science research. Accessing these resources promptly is crucial for timely research needs.
Flaum
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello! :D

I need help finding articles from print media sources that deal with types of surgery, not limited but including the surgical sciences and arts, as well as articles dealing with topics like diabetes and cancer. I need these articles ASAP.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google is your best friend.
 
The best site for searching for biomedical research articles is PubMed. Keep in mind, it will only get you as far as the abstract of the article, which is a brief summary of the contents. But, once you have the reference and the abstract sounds like something relevant, you can look up the full article. Check with your school library about how to get the full article (many are available electronically if you access them through your school if they have a subscription).

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?dr=abstract
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top