Need guidance with Chemistry - energy related

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the decrease in ocean levels if transportation systems were powered by hydrogen gas instead of liquid hydrocarbons. Participants suggest a step-by-step approach: first, determine the energy produced from oxidizing one mole of hydrogen, then calculate the total moles needed to meet the annual energy demand of 10^17 kJ. Next, they recommend calculating the volume of water required for that amount of hydrogen and finally, converting that volume into a decrease in sea level. This methodical approach aims to provide clarity on the complex relationship between energy consumption and ocean levels. Understanding these calculations is crucial for addressing energy sustainability and environmental impact.
timsher
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I'm really lost on this question...could somebody please point me in the right direction?



The annual world use of liquid hydrocarbon fuels for transportation purposes currently generates about 10^17 kJ. If we could instead run our transportation system by oxidizing hydrogen gas to gaseous water, we would likely have to obtain the hydrogen by electrolyzing water. Suppose we made and stored enough hydrogen for 100 years by electrolyzing seawater. By how much would the level of the oceans decrease (in m)?


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not entirely sure on how to work out the answer but this may point you in the right direction :

1st calculate the amount of energy the oxidation of one mole of hydrogen produces
2nd calculate how many moles of hydrogen would be needed to meet the demand of 10^17kJ
3rd calculate how much water would be required to meet the demand of that many moles of hydrogen
4th calculate the volume of water that is equivalent to then work out the decrease in the sea level
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Thread 'How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)'
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW. Here is what I did to try to solve it The table cited in the problem is below We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given. The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22. Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode. Electrons...
Back
Top