Need help calculating wavelengths of L(alpha) and L(beta

  • Thread starter Thread starter obi-wan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavelengths
obi-wan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need some guidance on a particular question for my coursework.

The questions states: Calculate the wavelength of L(alpha) and L(beta) x-ray photons produced from a copper target (Z=29)


I have tried finding the wavelength using E=hc/lambda and re-arranged for lambda (lambda=hc/E)

Is this the correct approach to solving the problem? Alpha and beta rays travel at the same speed ~ 3*10^8m/s, seems like I'm missing something.

I don't want answers as this doesn't help me in any way but just need some guidance as to how it can be worked out.

Your help is much appreciated..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alpha and beta rays no not travel at the same speed, they aren't photons. They are likely talking about specific electron transitions in copper. I'm guessing they are talking about Lyman-alpha and Lyman-beta. Look those up and see if it looks like that's what L(alpha) and L(beta) mean.
 
obi-wan said:
Hi, I need some guidance on a particular question for my coursework.

The questions states: Calculate the wavelength of L(alpha) and L(beta) x-ray photons produced from a copper target (Z=29)


I have tried finding the wavelength using E=hc/lambda and re-arranged for lambda (lambda=hc/E)

Is this the correct approach to solving the problem? Alpha and beta rays travel at the same speed ~ 3*10^8m/s, seems like I'm missing something.

I don't want answers as this doesn't help me in any way but just need some guidance as to how it can be worked out.

Your help is much appreciated..


I also certain they are talking about Lyman alpha and beta transitions, like Dick suggested. The only problem is that copper has obviously many electrons.

So maybe they are referring to transitions of the last electron (the first 28 electrons fill the n=1,2 and 3 shells). So maybe they are referring to the transition between n=4 and n=5? I am not sure what they would use for the charge of the screened nucleus. The most simple-minded thing to try is Z=1 but in real life the outer electron would see a screened value a bit different than this.

On the other hand, Lyman usually refers to transitions from n=1 so would they assume a hydrogen-like copper atom? (one for which 28 electrons have been stripped off?) In which case one would use the Bohr energy level equation with Z=29. But this interpretation seems unlikely.
 
When x-rays strike an electron on a copper surface this produces a radiation and a recoiling electron. However this radiation is not in the form of gamma or beta rays (correct me if I'm wrong here)

The question seems to be missing something and I can't think of anything else that would relate the gamma and beta rays to x-ray photons. The question does not talk about transitions between any energy levels.. best to ask my tutor to see if he makes sense of it.

thanks for your time Dick & nrqed.
 
obi-wan said:
When x-rays strike an electron on a copper surface this produces a radiation and a recoiling electron. However this radiation is not in the form of gamma or beta rays (correct me if I'm wrong here)
I don't understand the question then. The question askes about X ray photons produced by Cu atoms. Here you are talking about bombarding Cu atoms with x-rays. I did not think that was the question. But I am maybe completely misinterpreting.

Better clarify things with your tutor.

best luck!
 
sorry I've confused you there :) yes the question does ask about x-ray photons being produced by a Cu target. Nevermind, I will see my tutor tomorrow and get him to clarify things. Will keep this thread updated once the question makes sense, hopefully solving it and marking the thread as 'Solved'

thank you nrqed
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top