Need help Figuring out the topic

  • Thread starter Thread starter el_hijoeputa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topic
el_hijoeputa
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This might sound silly... I was on a travel, and arrived late at my class of Quantum Mechanics 2. The proffesor was in the middle of a disscusion, and I'm trying to figure what was it. I asked one of my classmates and said he was talking about something with Projection operators. He was discussing a problem of a system with two states, and then started to discuss a system of three states, two states with strong interaction, and another one of less interaction (?).

-------------- (P)



--------------
-------------- (Q)

He then defined:
P = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)

Q = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array}\right)

All seems to get down to claculate P G(z) P

Anyway, I won't see the professor until next thursday. If someone can figure out the topic so I can start studying to get up to date this weekend, I will appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
according to me, your professor was talking about irreducible representations of symmetry-groups and how you can construct operators that will extract the parts of some physical system (ie the operators on the wavefunction) that correspond to each irreducible representation. In order to do so, the socalled partnerfunctions can be used. These functions can also generate a representation for certain symmetry-groups. These are all applications of group theory in QM.

could it be something like this ?

marlon
 
Each interaction can be described using such symmetry-groups and therefore it is always valid to know what parts of the wavefunction correspond to one specific interaction. you have parts coming from L-S-coupling , parts coming from the Zeemann-effect and so on...until quarks and their colours

marlon
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
959
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
907
Back
Top