Need Help Finding Data Concerning the Pyrolysis and Smouldering of Materials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prince Rilian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Materials
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the combustion temperatures of various materials, specifically pyrolysis, smouldering, and flaming temperatures. Data provided includes temperatures for wood/paper, polyethylene, and anthracite coal, with some uncertainty expressed about the accuracy of coal's flaming temperature. Participants note the lack of comprehensive data on combustion temperatures despite the long history of fire use by humans. There is also a clarification regarding temperature scales, distinguishing between Celsius and Fahrenheit. The conversation highlights the need for more accessible information on this topic.
Prince Rilian
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
I am having a bit of trouble finding data about the various combustion temperatures (pyrolysis, smouldering, and flaming) temperatures of everyday materials.

Here is the data I have collected so far (forgive me if anything is wrong):
*Wood/Paper (C6H10O5)x: Pyrolysis Temperature is 233°C (451°F), Smouldering Temperature is ≈382°C (≈720°F), and Flaming Temperature is ≈590°C (≈1000°F).
*Polyethylene (CH2)x: Melting Temperature is ≈120°C (≈248°F), Pyrolysis Temperature is 210°C (410°F), and Smouldering Temperature is 349°C (660°F).
*Coal (C), Anthracite Variety: Pyrolysis Temperature is ≈450°C (≈842°F), Smouldering Temperature is ≈700°C (≈1300°F), and Flaming Temperature is ≈950°C (≈1,740°F).

That last piece of data (coal combustion temperatures) doesn't seem to be quite right, as blackbody-radiation objects (such as coal) are brightly white-hot at 950°C, and I have never seen white-hot coal before.

I am kind of amazed that more data has not been collected on this subject, as human beings have been using fire ever since we...well, ever were human. Grant it, the measurement of exact temperatures only began in the 1600's, but still, humans use fire every day in some form, so I would think that more data would be available!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're right. I got my scales mixed up. 1,740°C would be white-hot, but not 1740°F (950°C).

And for your information, I have already visited the website that you mentioned about a week ago! (Although it is nonetheless useful information.)
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top