Need help on this problem please I cant figure it out

  • Thread starter Thread starter miranda82
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure
AI Thread Summary
The skateboarder, weighing 54.0 kg, starts with a speed of 1.90 m/s and does +80.0 J of work while experiencing -265 J of friction. The final speed is 5.90 m/s, indicating a net gain in energy. The change in gravitational potential energy is calculated to be 0.5 J, resulting in a vertical height change of 0.5 m. Consequently, the skater is above the starting point due to the positive work done and the increase in speed.
miranda82
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Need help on this problem please! I can't figure it out!

The problem is A 54.0 kg. skateboarder starts out with a speed of 1.90 m/s. He does +80.0 J of work on himself by pushing with his feet against the ground. In addition, friction does -265 J of work on him. In both cases, the forces doing the work are nonconservative. The final speed of the skateboarder is 5.90 m/s.
(a) Calculate the change (PE = PEf - PE0) in the gravitational potential energy?
J
(b) How much has the vertical height of the skater changed?
m
(c) Is the skater above or below the starting point?
above the starting point or
below the starting point ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


(a) To calculate the change in gravitational potential energy, we can use the formula PE = mgh, where m is the mass of the skateboarder (54.0 kg), g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2), and h is the change in height. We can rearrange the formula to solve for h: h = PE / (mg). Since we are given the change in potential energy (PE = PEf - PE0), we can substitute this into the formula and solve for h: h = (PEf - PE0) / (mg). Plugging in the values, we get h = (80 - (-265)) / (54.0*9.8) = 0.5 m. Therefore, the change in gravitational potential energy is 0.5 J.

(b) Since we know the change in height is 0.5 m, we can conclude that the vertical height of the skater has changed by 0.5 m.

(c) Based on the given information, we can determine that the skater is above the starting point. This is because the skater has done positive work on himself (+80 J) and the final speed is greater than the initial speed. This means that the skater has gained energy and therefore must be above the starting point.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top