MHB Need help solving this logarithmic problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sharpy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
Sharpy1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
(e3x)(e4)x = e4x -15

Could use help solving this here within the next 40 minutes, appreciate the help, this is the last one out of a 75 question take home test and I'm having soo many issues.

Thanks in advanced for the help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB!:

Has your professor given you permission to get outside help with this graded assignment?
 
Yes only for 3 questions and we have to post where we got the outside help from.
 
Okay, we are given:

$$e^{3x}\cdot \left(e^4 \right)^x=e^{4x}-15$$

I would first use the property of exponents $$\left(a^b \right)^c=a^{bc}$$ on the second factor on the left, and so we have:

$$e^{3x}\cdot e^{4x}=e^{4x}-15$$

What do we get when we apply the property $$a^b\cdot a^c=a^{b+c}$$ on the left?
 
I have it now, I was reading it as e4x-15 not e4x-15

Thanks for the help everyone
 
Your original interpretation has no real solutions. Glad you figured it out. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top