Need help understanding KE rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurosaki69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the understanding of kinetic energy (KE) in rotational motion, specifically using the formula KE = (1/2)Iw^2 and its translation to KE = (1/2)v^2/r^2. The variable 'v' represents the tangential velocity of a point on the rotating body, which is related to the angular velocity by the equation v = ωr. When considering a rolling object down an incline from rest, the velocity in question is indeed the velocity of the center of mass. In the case of a wheel rolling without slipping, the speed of the center of mass equals the tangential speed of the wheel's rim. This highlights the relationship between rotational motion and translational motion in rolling objects.
kurosaki69
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
i used the formula for KE rotation KE=(1/2)Iw^2 and i translated it to (1/2) v^2/r^2, but i wanted to know what does the v in the equation stand for. is it initial velocity or velocity of center of mass. if its is the velocity of center of mass can u tell me how to solve for it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether you know it or not, you made use of the relation v = \omega r, where v is the tangential velocity of some point on the rotating body and r is its distance from the axis.
 
ok thanks a lot my other question is what if the rotating object was rolling down a incline and it started at rest. would the velocity be the velocity of center mass of the object that is being rolled.
 
Let's take an example: A wheel, with radius r, rolls without slipping along some surface. The speed of its center with respect to the surface will be equal to the tangential speed of its rim with respect to its center.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top