Need help with Physics word problem dealing with Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The physics problem involves a girl walking on a plank that is free to slide on a frictionless surface, and the key questions are about their velocities relative to the ice. The girl walks at 1.50 m/s, and the plank moves in the opposite direction at -0.45 m/s, leading to confusion about her velocity relative to the ice. The initial calculations suggest subtracting the plank's velocity from the girl's, resulting in 1.05 m/s, but the textbook states her velocity is 1.15 m/s. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying conservation of momentum and ensuring that velocities from different reference frames are not mixed up. Clarification of the calculations is needed to resolve the discrepancy with the textbook answer.
Taren
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alright, First I'll explain the problem, then I'll explain what I've tried and what's confusing me.

A 45.0 kg girl is standing on a 150 kg plank. The plank, originally at rest, is free to slide on a frozen lake, which is a flat, frictionless surface. The girl begins to walk along the plank at a constant velocity of 1.50 m/s to the right relative to the plank. (A) What is her velocity relative to the ice surface? (B) What is the velocity of the plank relative to the ice surface?

Keep in mind that the preceeding paragraph is completely quoted from my textbook, so none of my assumptions are in it. Everything above is fact. I've looked through my lecture notes and my textbook, and I can't figure out this one...It's in our chapter dealing with momentum, so I kinda figured I'd plug all the variables into the formula for conservation of momentum. Doing that, I determined that the Plank was moving with a velocity of -.45 m/s while the girl was walking, moving against her velocity...I thought to find the answer to (A) all I'd have to do would be to subtract the plank's velocity from the girls velocity, I.E: 1.50 m/s - .45 m/s, which gave me the answer 1.05 m/s for the girl's velocity relative to the ice surface. But when I checked the book's answer, it said her velocity relative to the ice surface is 1.15 m/s. I don't know what I'm doing wrong, and I'm terribly confused...can someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the late reply. If you're still interested, here are my comments.

Taren said:
It's in our chapter dealing with momentum, so I kinda figured I'd plug all the variables into the formula for conservation of momentum.

Word of advice: Don't treat physics problems in a "plug-n-chug" fashion. Think about what you're doing.

Doing that, I determined that the Plank was moving with a velocity of -.45 m/s while the girl was walking, moving against her velocity...

How did you arrive at that number? It's impossible to spot any errors you might have made without seeing your work.

I thought to find the answer to (A) all I'd have to do would be to subtract the plank's velocity from the girls velocity, I.E: 1.50 m/s - .45 m/s, which gave me the answer 1.05 m/s for the girl's velocity relative to the ice surface.

You are indeed going to subtract two velocities, but you have to make sure that you don't mix up velocities from two different reference frames in your analysis. I suspect that that's what you did, but without seeing your steps I can't know for sure.
 
Wow, I'm wondering this too - how the book got 1.15.

Tom, or anyone else willing to help:

M(girl)V(girl)[initial] + M(plank)V(plank)[initial] = M(girl)V(girl)[final] + M(plank)V(plank)[final]

So: 0 + 0 = (45)(1.50) + (150)(V)
So: 0 = 67.5 + 150(V)
So: 67.5 = -150(V)
So: V = -.45 <--- Final Plank velocity.

So if the girl is 'moving' 1.50 m/s, and the plank is moving -.45 m/s -- wouldn't her velocity relative to the ice be 1.50 - .45 = 1.05 ??

What is wrong here? Taren said the book stated the answer as 1.15

Please help before tomorrow (Dec 6 07)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top