Need help with projectile motion problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the muzzle velocity of a pumpkin launched at the 1998 Punkin Chunkin World Championship, with a distance of 1227.23 meters. Participants note that typical range problems require two of three variables to solve for the third, and the optimal launch angle for maximum range is generally 45 degrees in a vacuum, but can vary between 30 and 45 degrees when considering air resistance. The book "Modern Practical Ballistics" by Arthur J. Pejsa is mentioned as a key resource, although its equations may not apply well to low ballistic coefficient objects like pumpkins. A humorous anecdote about a shotgun test adds levity to the discussion, but ultimately highlights the complexities of projectile motion. The conversation emphasizes the need for more precise calculations and considerations in such projectile motion problems.
kwaber1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I found this interesting problem on the internet, but I think there is not enough infromation to solve.
"At the 1998 Punkin Chunkin World Championship, a pneumatically-driven device called the "Aludium Q36 Pumpkin Modulator" was able to project a 3.6-4.5 kg (8-10 pound) pumpkin intact for a total distance of 1227.23 m (4026.32 feet, how many feet are in a mile?). What was the muzzle velocity (magnitude and direction) of the record-setting pumpkin?"

Most range formula problems give you 2 of the 3 variables to solve for the third R, vo or Θ
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neglecting the effects of friction (a necessary but absurd assumption) there is a value of ##\theta## that gives you the maximum range. I think it's understood that the pumpkin was chucked at this angle.
 
The optimal angle for maximum range in a vacuum is 45 degrees. When the effect of air resistance is included, it's between 30 and 45 degrees.

The definitive book on the subject is Modern Practical Ballistics, by Arthur J. Pejsa. The equations in that book may not cover objects with the (low) ballistic coefficient of pumpkins. If so, numerical methods are needed.

For a shotgun with birdshot fired at (very roughly) 30 degree elevation, the pellets come almost straight down at maximum range. This from a test where my dad had my mother shoot at him. Unfortunately, she had no experience with a double barrel shotgun with double triggers, so she fired both barrels at the same time and got knocked down from the recoil. That ended further testing.
 
  • Like
Likes btlang
JRMichler said:
For a shotgun with birdshot fired at (very roughly) 30 degree elevation, the pellets come almost straight down at maximum range. This from a test where my dad had my mother shoot at him. Unfortunately, she had no experience with a double barrel shotgun with double triggers, so she fired both barrels at the same time and got knocked down from the recoil. That ended further testing.

This is a fascinating report. One could speculate all day about your parents relationship (lol!). Considering the legal/moral/ethical aspects of this situation, it is probably best that testing ended at that point.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top