Need something solving PROBLEM AHOY

  • Thread starter Thread starter SolStis
  • Start date Start date
SolStis
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Need something solving! PROBLEM AHOY!

Hi there,

Im in dire need of a problem solving because i really cba to do it at this time of nite and need sorting by 2moz morning... putting my faith in PF here... I don't think its too diff I just havnt done any algebra for a while and need some assistance.

Need this rearranging for Z:

1=-((e^ZL)+(e^Zw))

Any help much appreciated!


Regards

Sol
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


If L and w are arbitrary (assuming multiplying Z in the exponents) there is no closed form solution for Z.
 


ok mate, well is there any way i can find it if L and W arnt arbitrary?
 


In real numbers, the problem is immediate: no linear combination of powers of e will ever equal -1.

In complex numbers, L = W would make things a lot simpler, but that's trivial...
 


Ok, well in this instance i need it solving for w = 24 and L = 3500, but i would like a general solution so i can apply any values for L and w
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top