Negative Feedback System: Understanding its Practicality

  • Thread starter Thread starter LM741
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feedback System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the practicality of a negative feedback system, particularly regarding the confusion over output signals and feedback mechanisms. The original poster questions how a feedback signal can lead to zero output when the desired output is achieved. Responses clarify that the feedback amplifier gain operates on the error signal, not directly on the input, which resolves the misunderstanding. The conversation also touches on the generalization of amplifier gain and its implications for system stability. Ultimately, the original poster acknowledges a shift in understanding after consulting with a lecturer.
LM741
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
hey guys.
attached is a negative feedback system. This is used to control the system and maintain stability. But something doesn't make sense to me.
If you look at the diagram, when the output is y(t)=4sint (as required) then the feedback signal becomes f(t)=2sint, but that means that the signal put back into the system will be zero (because i take my feedback signal and subtract it from my original signal) that means i will get zero output every now and then...doesn't seem very practical...can someone please shed some light ...
thanks
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
Was this a problem you had? can you post the rest of it and not just the answer you came up with? Otherwise, yea, what you got here is a failure to communicate. signal goes in, nothing comes out.
 
no its just something that bothers me about a negative feedback system - it just doesn't make sense because when the output is what we want (4sint) then like i said - then we'll get nothing coming out - just doesn't seem right... say out output rises to 6sint fro example, then the negative feedback system is mean to counteract that - but dont' see how it does that coz then all that happens is our output becmoes (si -sf = 2sint - 3sint = -sint) -sint...
hope you can understand my dillema...
 
Your reasoning is wrong. The amplifier gain (2) acts on the error signal se and not on the input signal.
y = 2*se = 2*(si - sf)
so
sf = 0.5*y = 0.5*2*(si - sf) = si - sf
so
2*sf = si
or sf = si/2
se = si/2
y = si

The gain of your feedback amplifier is 1
 
You could have figured this out by know that L = ab = 2*.5 = 1.
 
corneo>>you missing the point
 
y=2*se
sf = 0.5*y
y=2*si - 2*sf
y=2*si - y
y=si

gain = 1
 
Also, note that you can generalize your your amplifier gain by substituting your gain values for general gain values to yield gain = K1/(1 + K1K2), where K1 is the gain of the block on the top, and K2 is the gain of the block on the bottom.
 
For completeness, I'm going to derive the general result of leright's post#8 using the generalization of the calculation done by SGT in post#4 and leright in post#7.

Terminology and definitions:
Vi = input voltage
Vo = output voltage
Vf = feedback voltage
Ve = error voltage = Vi - Vf (for negative feedback)
A = open loop gain or open loop transfer function = Vo/Ve (= Vo/Vi, when Vf=0)
B = feedback ratio = Vf/Vo
L = closed loop gain or overall transfer function = Vo/Vi

Proof:
Vo = A*Ve {defn} = A*(Vi - Vf) {defn} = A*(Vi - B*Vo) {defn} = A*Vi - A*B*Vo
=> Vo*(1+AB) = AVi
=> L = Vo/Vi = A/(1+AB)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To address the question in the OP, the input function Vi is not 2sint; that is the error function, Ve.
 
  • #10
sup guys

apparently my frame of thought was wrong. I asked the lecturer. YOu can't look at the system like that. The signal is sort of instantaneous..or something like that..

just to let you guys know...
thanks for any feedback though.
john
 
Back
Top