Negative Indices: Explaining the "Super Minus

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gepard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices Negative
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the term "super minus" in the context of the Kalman Filter paper. It is clarified that the superscript minus is not a typo but a notation used to differentiate "a priori" measurements from "a posteriori" measurements. The notation serves to indicate the type of measurement rather than carrying intrinsic meaning. The explanation helps the original poster, Michael, grasp the concept better. Further confirmation from someone familiar with the paper is suggested for additional clarity.
Gepard
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Apologies if this is in the wrong place but I've no idea what *it* does...

I should just mention that I'm currently doing my A-levels (16) and so my maths skills aren't that advanced...

The problem:
I've found a paper on the Kalman Filter on the internet (source: http://www.cs.unc.edu/~welch/media/pdf/kalman_intro.pdf)

Now, I'm trying to get my head around it, but am struggling with what the "'super minus'" means at the bottom of page 2.

I've asked all the teachers at school and none of them have any idea and keep telling me it's a typo and we've only dealt with indices that have a number in them.

Could someone here please explain what it means?

Cheers,

Michael
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, firstly, I don't know anything about the topic, but it is clearly not a typo! My take on it is that it just a notation: he is using the superscript - to distinguish the "a priori" measurements from the "a posteriori" measurements (with no superscript). In this sense the superscript - doesn't itself "mean" anything-- he could have used a ' or anything else to distinguish this, but just chose the -

Hope that helps, but you may have to wait for someone who is familiar with the paper to confirm (or contradict) what I have just said!
 
Thanks Cristo, that makes a lot of sense.

Cheers,

Michael
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top