Negative Rest Mass: Faster than Light?

Daedalus_
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Theoretically, if an object were to have negative rest mass, would it travel faster than light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daedalus_ said:
Theoretically, if an object were to have negative rest mass, would it travel faster than light?

Which kind of mass are you talking about -- inertial mass, "active" gravitational mass, or the "passive" gravitational mass?

Generally, when considering negative masses, it is assumed that they fall with the same acceleration as as positive masses, and conservation of momentum is valid. They do not travel faster than light.

By putting '-m' in place of m in Newton's law of gravitation, you can play around a bit with the concept of negative mass. Note that negative masses move in the opposite direction of the applied force on it. Can you figure out what will happen when a mass m and a mass '-m' are just left close to one another?

To answer your question, objects with imaginary masses, which are called tachyons, travel faster than light.

EDIT: There is already a lot of discussion going on in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=66852, which I had somehow missed.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Thread 'Relativator (Circular Slide-Rule): Simulated with Desmos - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
View full post »

Similar threads

B c^2 in Einstein‘s theory of relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
B Does a hot coffee have bigger mass than a cold coffee?
3
Replies
102
Views
6K
B Let me ask a thing about the Speed of Light
Replies
6
Views
1K
I A question about Relativity of Time using Time dilation experiment
Replies
12
Views
2K
I The answer for the total mass of the Universe?
Replies
36
Views
2K
B What if we use a non physical reference point to measure an object's mass?
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Can Curved Spacetime Enable Faster-Than-Light Travel?
Replies
12
Views
3K
B Can We Create a Warp Drive for Light? - Josh's Curiousity
Replies
15
Views
2K
B Photon Energy Without Rest Mass – How?
Replies
17
Views
2K
Is there really nothing faster than light?
Replies
40
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top