Negative Work but Average Force positive in this situation?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding negative work involves recognizing that it occurs when the force acts in the opposite direction to the displacement. In the example of a bullet being stopped by a block, the work done on the bullet is negative, as the change in kinetic energy (KE) is negative. When calculating the average force exerted by the block, the formula F = W / (cos θ * s) indicates that while work is negative, the average force is positive due to the negative sign from cos 180. The magnitudes of force and displacement are always positive, clarifying that the sign of the work reflects the direction of the force relative to displacement. Thus, the logic behind the negative work aligns with the principles of kinetic energy and force direction.
smsport
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I just want to make sure I'm understanding negative work correctly. An example problem where there is a bullet with an initial velocity of x m/s and a final velocity of 0 m/s. It is stopped by a wood block and the question asks to determine the amount of work done on the bullet by the block. If I use the ΔKE = W formula (we are assuming here that the only work being done is by block so W is just the W of the block) I will get a negative number because KE final is 0 but KE initial is a positive # (using the bullets movement along the positive x axis). Therefore, the work done on the bullet by the block is negative. This makes sense to me in that I understand negative work means the work done is in the opposite direction of the displacement. So in this instance, the change in KE and the amount of work done are the same and are both negative (change in KE is negative not KE itself).

To determine the average force the block exerts on the bullet I would use the Work equation: F (cos theta)(s). Because this is horizontal but the work being done is opposite the displacment, theta is 180 degrees, correct? Therefore, the average force exerted by the block will not be a negative number, correct? Example: Work= -X joules= Fcos180 x s (positive displacement #). Divide by s, then divide by cos 180 (-1) to get F. Negative divided by negative is positive so average force exerted is positive.

Do I have this correct? Am I understanding negative work properly and how to correctly use 180 for theta in horizontal situations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
smsport said:
Example: Work= -X joules= Fcos180 x s (positive displacement #).
The "F" and "s" in that formula are the magnitudes of the force and displacement.
The magnitude of a vector is positive and this is so in all cases.
The sign of the force itself depends on the direction that you take positive.
If you consider positive in the direction of the velocity, then the force is negative (and displacement positive).
The sign of the work depends on the direction of the force relative to the displacement so it is independent of the choice of positive axis.
 
Okay, if in the W= F x cos theta x s equation, the F and s are the magnitudes of F and s then if I am solving for F using that equation the F I am solving for will just be the magnitude of F therefore positive or negative is not an issue if I am understanding that correctly. I understand that the magnitude of a vector is positive, but I wasn't sure if that equation involved magnitudes of the F and s. Now that I know it does it makes that part more clear. If I was looking for the sign of the force itself in the example I gave, then that would be negative because my sign convention is that positive is in the direction of the velocity as I noted in my first post.

Now, for the sign of the work. If my equation of W= KE final- KE initial gets me a negative result, then isn't the work done (in this case where the only work being considered is that of the block on the bullet) negative also? When you say "The sign of the work depends on the direction of the force relative to the displacement so it is independent of the choice of positive axis." does this differ from my logic behind the KEf - KEi equation and work being negative in this case?
 
Yes, if the kinetic energy decreases the work done by the net force is negative.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top