Demystifier said:
Nerds are usually considered bad in sports. But in some sports, they seem to be in fact better than average population. For instance, it seems to me that they like mountaineering and climbing more than average population. What are your experiences?
My family definitely qualifies as "geeks": two Physics PhDs, two Chemistry majors planning on grad school, and one Physics major aspiring to a PhD at a top 5 school.
Our favored sports: fencing (epee), tennis, ultimate, mountain biking, fishing, and shooting (NRA high power and a long range precision discipline called F-Class).
We're not olympic quality in any of them, but my daughter went to the collegiate nationals with her University in fencing, my son is ranked in the top 150 in a large Southern state in tennis, my wife and I were the tennis champs in our local senior games, I mountain bike 2000 miles a year, my fishing Youtube channel gets over 10k views a month, and our family has a long list of victories in the shooting sports including a few national championships and a bunch of regional victories.
I think being geeks has empowered us to each find our niches - we can figure out the things we'll be really good at with a few years of practice and effort, and we figure out how to make the most of available practice time and resources. We tend to avoid sports dominated by stupid jocks. Finally, (regarding the senior games) it's not that my wife and I have become any kind of real athletes, it's that the vast majority of our age cohort has gotten fat and sedentary. With modest efforts, our age related decline has been much slower than most others in our age cohort - that and keeping up with three teenagers has help keep us fit and motivated.
Edited to add:
Just remembered we are also pretty good at mini-golf. I shot -10 and -12 so far this year and our family teams have come in 2nd or better at several local tournaments.