Net electric field question almost have it but can't get one part of it

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two fixed charges, -26 µC and +5 µC, separated by a distance of 1.3 m, and asks for the location along a line through the charges where the net electric field is zero, specifically relative to the positive charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve for the distance using the electric field equation but expresses confusion over the variable representing the distance from the positive charge. Some participants suggest clarifying the reference point for the distance and recommend first identifying the region where the electric field is zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem setup and discussing the implications of their calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the choice of variables and the relationship between the distances involved, but no consensus has been reached on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of discrepancies between the original poster's calculations and those from a textbook, as well as a reference to a previous discussion that may provide additional insights.

itsagulati
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two charges, -26 µC and +5 µC, are fixed in place and separated by 1.3 m.
(a) At what spot along a line through the charges is the net electric field zero? Locate this spot relative to the positive charge. (Hint: The spot does not necessarily lie between the two charges.)




Homework Equations


E = k*q/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



26e-6k / d^2 = 5e-6k / (1.3 - d)^2

i solved for that and got d = .9037 and d = 2.32 ...since i need them pointing in the same direction its the one that is not between them. i understand that...and it all seems right.

Does anyone get something different?

It is an odd #'d problem so i looked at the question in the book and was able to work it to get the right answers for the book version, but my online #s are different and while i work it very similarly and it all makes logical sense. I get them wrong :(

Any tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question asks for the distance from the positive charge... so this is not 'd'... from your formula d is the distance from the negative charge...

Although your equation is technically correct... I'd advise first finding the region where the field is 0, then choosing your variable appropriately... There was a recent thread on this and Doc Al gave a great explanation.
 
I saw that and read it and hten posted this one. Based on what i picked up in that thread, I ended up with the above.

However, based on what you said I assume if we drew it out on a line...with the negative charge as our starting point...2.32m out would be what I said was the answer. However, since there is a distance from the negative charge to the positive charge of 1.3m...then 2.32m- 1.3m = 1.02m? Does this sound right?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
itsagulati said:
I saw that and read it and hten posted this one. Based on what i picked up in that thread, I ended up with the above.

However, based on what you said I assume if we drew it out on a line...with the negative charge as our starting point...2.32m out would be what I said was the answer. However, since there is a distance from the negative charge to the positive charge of 1.3m...then 2.32m- 1.3m = 1.02m? Does this right?

Thanks!

Yes, 1.02m is right. That's cool... I thought since you used (1.3 - d)^2 instead of (d - 1.3)^2, you were expecting d to be less than 1.3... both equations are the same...

As long as you know what's happening, it's all good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K