Calculating Net Force on Two Books: Explanation and Example

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of net force on two books placed on a frictionless horizontal surface, focusing on the forces acting between the books and the implications of gravity and normal force. Participants explore the application of Newton's laws and the effects of internal forces in a system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that the net force on the system is equal to the applied force ##\vec{F}##, as internal forces between the books cancel out.
  • Another participant confirms this reasoning and emphasizes the importance of recognizing and ignoring internal forces when calculating net force.
  • Concerns are raised about the orientation of the applied force ##\vec{F}## and its relationship with gravity and the normal force, with one participant clarifying that gravity and the normal force cancel each other.
  • A follow-up question is posed regarding the scenario where the normal force does not exist, leading to a discussion about the implications of gravity on the motion of the books.
  • Some participants suggest that without a normal force, the net force would have a downward component, causing the books to accelerate downwards.
  • There is a discussion about the independence of motion in perpendicular directions, with one participant asserting that this remains true even if acceleration is not constant.
  • A light-hearted comment is made about the necessity of glue or velcro for the books to stay together.
  • One participant humorously notes the lack of clarity regarding the arrangement of the books, which led to misunderstandings in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the cancellation of internal forces and the application of Newton's laws, but there are differing views on the implications of gravity and the normal force, as well as the arrangement of the books. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effects of gravity in the absence of a normal force.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about the forces acting on the books, particularly concerning the normal force and gravity. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in problem statements to avoid misunderstandings.

ConfusedMonkey
Messages
42
Reaction score
15
This is an example given in my textbook:

"On a frictionless horizontal surface, you push with a force ##\vec{F}## on a book of mass ##m_1## that in turn pushes on a book with a mass ##m_2##. What force does the second book exert on the first?"

First they calculate the acceleration of book 2. This is how they do it:

"The total mass of the two blocks is ##m_1 + m_2##, and the net force applied to the combination is ##\vec{F}##.

I want to make sure that I understand correctly why the net force is ##\vec{F}##. Here is my explanation:

I originally push book 1 with a force of ##\vec{F}##. Because of this, book 1 starts to accelerate in the direction of my push and thus exerts a force, say ##\vec{F_{12}}## on book 2, and by Newton's third law, book 2 then exerts a force, say ##\vec{F_{21}}## on book 1. Thus the net force of the system is ##\vec{F} + \vec{F_{12}} + \vec{F_{21}} = \vec{F} + \vec{F_{12}} - \vec{F_{12}} = \vec{F}##. Is my reasoning correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ConfusedMonkey said:
Here is my explanation:
That explanation works. You've just demonstrated the general principle that all the internal forces have to cancel; if A exerts a force on B then B must exert an equal and opposite force on A so forces between A and B cannot contribute to the net force on the system made up of A and B. Do a few more of these problems and you'll find yourself effortlessly recognizing and ignoring the internal forces.

Of course you will still need the internal forces when it comes time to apply ##F=ma## to each individual object.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ConfusedMonkey
Did someone tell you the force ##\vec F## is parallel to the surface ? Because you sure didn't tell us !

ConfusedMonkey said:
Is my reasoning correct?
Yes. Gravity and the normal force from the surface cancel each other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ConfusedMonkey
BvU said:
Did someone tell you the force ##\vec F## is parallel to the surface ? Because you sure didn't tell us !

Yes. Gravity and the normal force from the surface cancel each other.

Sorry, ##\vec{F}## is parallel to the surface. Let me ask a follow up question now. Suppose the normal force didn't exist in this problem, so that there was nothing to cancel out gravity. This would not affect any of the calculations that I made above because gravity is acting perpendicularly to the forces in question. Right?
 
Somewhat artificial: the net force would have a component downwards (the books would start accelerating that way too...).

And: the books would not stay together without glue or velcro :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ConfusedMonkey
BvU said:
Somewhat artificial: the net force would have a component downwards (the books would start accelerating that way too...).

And: the books would not stay together without glue or velcro :smile:

Ah, that makes sense - if ##(F_x, 0)## is the force I apply with my hand, then ##(F_x, -g)## would be the net force if the normal force did not exist - it's just that gravity wouldn't have any affect on the horizontal distance traveled by the books.

Is that last point right?
 
$$
(F_x, -{\bf m_1}g)$$on book 1 (which is on top of -- or underneath ? -- book 2). And it has no way to exert a force on book 2, so that experiences ##(0, -m_2g)## only
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ConfusedMonkey
It is beside book 2. Let me ask a question is more general: I know that if acceleration is constant, then the component of acceleration in one direction has no effect on the motion in a perpendicular direction. To me, this would remain true even if acceleration was not constant. Am I right?
 
ConfusedMonkey said:
It is beside book 2
Next time post the complete problem statement; can avoid endless misunderstandings :rolleyes:
ConfusedMonkey said:
true even if acceleration was not constant. Am I right?
As long as they are independent, yes. Comes in handy when projectile trajectories are considered.
 
  • #10
BvU said:
And: the books would not stay together without glue or velcro :smile:

Would Galileo agree with this?
 
  • #11
We can't ask him any more. But I'm sure he would have appreciated a nice (sk)etching of the situation !

In my defence: that the books were beside each other instead of piled up wasn't revealed at that stage of the thread ... :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
905
Replies
3
Views
1K