Medical Neural Engineering: Education and Research | USA & Beyond

  • Thread starter Thread starter CosminaPrisma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Neural
AI Thread Summary
Neural engineering is emerging as a significant field in the USA and globally, drawing parallels with cybernetics. It encompasses two main areas: growing neural cells on chips and developing robotics that mimic brain functions. Educational backgrounds for those entering this field are diverse, often including disciplines such as mathematics, biology, physics, chemistry, and engineering, with advanced degrees like MSc and PhD being common for research roles. The discussion highlights ongoing research at institutions like the University at Albany and Cornell University, focusing on brain-computer interfaces and spinal cord injury solutions. The potential for new university programs dedicated to neural engineering is anticipated, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field. Additionally, there is interest in addressing overactive neuroemission linked to conditions like Parkinson's disease, suggesting a broader application of neural engineering in medical science.
CosminaPrisma
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
At different places across the USA and other countries, a new field is popping up called neural engineering. I am assuming that it is similar to cybernetics and I've seen some of the research they are doing and it looks very very cool...
Are any of you involved in that? If so, what kind of educational background do people in that field typically have?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
math, biology, physics, chem, and engineering...most interdisplinary sciences that I've looked geared towards that type of field are intense in courseload. of course if you want to do research in the field MSc and Phd.

I believe the field is of 2 parts...growing neural cells on chips, robotics/cybernetics that emulate the brain.

no I'm not involved in that particular field of neuro stuff...i'm trying to become a sim-modeller.
 
I'm sure you've heard some of the big "buzz words" in that field - "brain-computer interface" and "nanotechnology". There was/is a group at the University at Albany (NY) working with another group at Cornell that was doing a lot of cell/synthetic interface type experiments. Cornell also just recently set up a very large nanotechnology center on campus, I would assume some neuroscience/neural enginerering is going on there. Another group at Albany was working with spinal cord injuries and connecting the brain to computers to enable control of electronics/robotics.

As far as background and fields of study, neurocomp2003 has got it. There are so many different applications of technology and life science in that field that pretty much anything goes. Now I would imagine there are, or soon will be, more courses (or even programs) that are specific to this field of study cropping up at major universities.
 
Is there the potential for limiting overactive neuroemission that has also been associated with physical debilitation, in cases such as parkinson's, Shy-Drager, ect?
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top