Neutrino Arrival Time: 3 Periods or 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino Time
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
If you produce a lot of neutrinos over a short period of time, and then let them travel a distance long enough that their rest mass makes an appreciable difference in their travel time compared to photons emitted at the same time:

Will they arrive:
1) At 3 separate periods of time because the 3 mass eigenstates each have a different rest mass, speed and arrival time, or
2) At the same time, because each neutrino oscillates through all 3 mass eigenstates, and over several oscillation periods has a single average speed and a single valued average rest mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what exactly you mean by "If you produce a lot of neutrinos over a short period of time".
 
You can always describe the time-evolution in terms of the independent mass eigenstates (neglecting interaction with matter on its path). The production is a superposition of those 3. If you somehow manage to produce a neutrino with a very precise, well-defined energy and production time, I would expect separation of the mass eigenstates with flight distance.
However, I do not see any way to test this - even with low-energetic neutrinos from fusion processes, the gamma factors are somewhere at ~10^9, giving v=(1-10^18)c or 1ns separation after several years (and light-years!) of flight.
 
mfb said:
However, I do not see any way to test this - even with low-energetic neutrinos from fusion processes, the gamma factors are somewhere at ~10^9, giving v=(1-10^18)c or 1ns separation after several years (and light-years!) of flight.

Or 1 ms after 10^15 seconds... meaning 30 million years.

Hundreds of millions to a few milliard lightyears are typical distances to gamma ray flashes.

Do gamma ray flashes emit any neutrinos?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top