I Neutrino Oscillations and Mass

Trixie Mattel
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello

Just wondering, would neutrino oscillations occur is the three standard model neutrinos were the same mass?

or are different masses needed in order to have different phases differences, as the phases differences are why the oscillations occur?Also why do neutrino oscillations prove that neutrinos are not massless. Is it because the weak eigenstates are a linear superposition of mass eigenstates?Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Trixie Mattel said:
Just wondering, would neutrino oscillations occur is the three standard model neutrinos were the same mass?
If all three mass eigenstates have the same mass, there are no oscillations. The oscillation parameters depend on the differences between the squared masses. You have to have non-zero differences for oscillations.

One mass eigenstate could be massless, but that would be odd - it is expected that all three mass eigenstates have a non-zero mass, but currently we are sure only for two of them.
 
  • Like
Likes Trixie Mattel
mfb said:
One mass eigenstate could be massless

Can it? I think the standard derivation assumes that all three mass eigenstates have rest frames. There may be some other way to approach it without this assumption.
 
  • Like
Likes Trixie Mattel
As far as I know it is no problem to have one mass at exactly zero instead of a very small mass. @Orodruin knows it for sure.
 
  • Like
Likes Trixie Mattel
It is perfectly fine to have one massless neutrino. It occurs in some (admittedly odd) models, eg, type I seesaw with only two righthanded neutrinos.
 
  • Like
Likes Trixie Mattel and mfb
A number of problematic and/or off topic posts and responses have been deleted. Thread re-opened.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
87
Views
18K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top