Neutron Fission & Quantum Physics: How Does Gravity Affect Trajectory?

1907Quarter
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
just thinking cross sections here. a neutron that is freed as a result of a fission of pure U235. travels @c/10(fast!) will its trajectory be perturbed by the gravitational force emitted by a nearby nucleus, or do things on the quantum level work differently?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Neutrons are affected by gravity, but over much longer length scales. For ultracold neutrons that can give rise to interesting effects.

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2002/jan/17/neutrons-reveal-quantum-effects-of-gravity

The effect of gravity on neutrons is also a common problem in neutron small angle scattering.

How much neutrons are affected by the gravitational field of nearby nuclei I don't know. I guess someone will have to do the calculations (compare the kinetic energy of the neutron to the gravitational energy).
 


The gravitational effects of the stuff in a reactor is extremely miniscule in the workings of a reactor. Even the Earth's gravity will have very little effect, since the neutrons are moving quite fast and the distances involved are quite short.
 


1907Quarter said:
just thinking cross sections here. a neutron that is freed as a result of a fission of pure U235. travels @c/10(fast!) will its trajectory be perturbed by the gravitational force emitted by a nearby nucleus, or do things on the quantum level work differently?
One could calculate the force of gravity between a U235 nucleus and a neutron, and then compare to the nuclear force.

The gravitational effect is insignificant. The nuclear effects dwarf the effect of gravity.

A fast neutron in a LWR is more likely to interact with a proton in the cooling water than it is to be captured by a U235 or U238 atom. The slowing down of neutrons takes on the order of milliseconds. Control of the system is actually achieved by virture of delayed neutrons that come from certain radionuclides (e.g., Br-87, 88, 89, I-137, 138, Rb-93, 94) that emit neutrons seconds after the fission event from which they were created.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top