Neutron Star Mass: Understanding the Chandrasekhar Limit

AI Thread Summary
The Chandrasekhar limit, approximately 1.4 solar masses, defines the maximum mass for a stable white dwarf, beyond which it cannot exist due to electron degeneracy pressure. Neutron stars, however, are supported by neutron degeneracy pressure and can theoretically exist with masses below this limit. The confusion arises from the distinction between the mass limits for white dwarfs and neutron stars, as the latter can form from supernova remnants that may initially exceed the Chandrasekhar limit. Factors such as the density of the proto-neutron star also influence its stability and formation. Understanding these principles clarifies how neutron stars can exist with masses less than 1.4 solar masses.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
The Chandrasekhar limit (~1.4 Msolar) is an upper limit to the mass a white dwarf star. So this means we can not have a white dwarf star in nature that weighs more than this. But is it true that we can have a neutron star that weighs less than 1.4 Msolar?
If so, this makes no sense to me because "the Chandrasekhar limit is the maximum nonrotating mass which can be supported against gravitational collapse by electron degeneracy pressure". But a neutron star is supported by neutron degeneracy pressure!
I always learned that if the remnant core of star was more than 1.4Msolar it would have to be a neutron star? but how can it be less than this and still be a neutron star?

Where am i going wrong?

thank you
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I've checked some refences and why it can be a NS below M_Chandrasekhar is perhaps written in this source:

http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/aa/ps/2001/08/aah2358.ps.gz


Also things like density of the proto-NS matters etc, density and mass plays a role.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top