Neutron stars not sustained by degeneracy force?

AI Thread Summary
Neutron stars are not solely sustained by neutron degeneracy forces, as some claim, but also by nuclear forces, specifically residual strong forces like pion exchange. The mainstream view suggests that neutron degeneracy pressure plays a critical role in preventing collapse. However, the nuclear strong force, which binds protons and neutrons, operates differently under extreme conditions. In neutron stars, the immense pressure can disassemble atomic nuclei and protons, but neutrons remain intact. Both forces contribute to the stability of neutron stars, highlighting the complexity of their structure.
dalcde
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
I have just attended a talk, where the speaker (a professor in Hong Kong University) claims that neutron stars don't collapse due to "nuclear forces". He further explains that those nuclear forces are residual strong forces (i.e. exchange of pions). However, the mainstream saying (according to Wikipedia) I've heard is that they are sustained by neutron degeneracy forces. Which is correct? And if it is indeed sustained by nuclear force, how does it work since as far as I know, nuclear forces are attractive.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Both are correct. The nuclear strong force only applies to atomic nuclei. It is what binds protons to neutrons and quarks to quarks. The pressure in a neutron star is great enough to disassemble atomic nuclei, and protons but, not enough to dismantle neutrons.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top