Neutronium article @ Wikipedia in need of experts and knowledgeables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights significant confusion and misinformation surrounding neutronium on Wikipedia, particularly regarding its classification on the periodic table. Participants debate its chemical symbol, electron configuration, and whether it should be included in the periodic table at all, given that neutronium is a hypothetical state of matter found in neutron stars and lacks electrons. The conversation criticizes the use of unreliable sources for information and emphasizes the need for expert contributions to clarify these scientific concepts. Additionally, the complexities of atomic structure and interactions, such as electron sharing in molecules, are mentioned to illustrate the challenges in categorizing neutronium. The thread underscores the importance of accurate scientific representation in educational resources like Wikipedia.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Some of the things they are arguing about are:
What chemical symbol does neutronium have on the periodic table?
How many electrons are in its valance shell?
Where is its position on the periodic table?
Should we use the "Chemical Galaxy" periodic table? (have you heard of this?)
Should we call it "nilnilnilnilium?"

People are citing sources like "Slate" (http://slate.com) and people's personal Yahoo and MSN websites.
 
'Neutronium' is a hypothetical state of matter that can only exist [by any known physics] under the influence of extreme gravity - like in a neutron star. It is not an element, it has no electrons [they are crushed out of existence], it's just a messy smear of elementary particles [mostly neutrons] that are forced to coexist in unnaturally cramped quarters.
 
Chronos said:
it has no electrons [they are crushed out of existence]
Actually, if you think about it, they (electrons) are chrushed into its existence...:confused:

But, yes, I agree with your whole comment. The periodic table was "designed" to show the elements and to show electron configurations to help understand how the elements can combine, usually at the outer (lowest energy state) shell, with other elements to form the various compounds.

As an example, someone should go find a graphic showing a water molecule; it isn't just one H2O, it is several sharing electron shells with an actual volumn of "empty" in the center. This is why you can mix one exact liter of water with one exact liter of (pure) alcohol and the final measurement will always be less than two liters. The alcohol molecules actually fit inside the water molecules...:eek:

If all states of matter were to have a place on the periodic table, including hypothetical Neutronium as element "zero", then where would Quarks go?? As elements +1/3, +2/3, -1/3 and -2/3 ?? Probably not.


EDIT: No, I didn't forget fission, where heavy elements uncombine to form lighter elements, such as vaporized Japanese buildings.
OOPS! Was I wrong on the shell energy state?...:confused:
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top